No abstract

Background Coagulopathy is still a serious pattern of coronavirus-19 disease. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and multiple hemostatic markers in Egyptian patients. In addition, to assess coagulation acute phase reactants and its effect on the outcome. Methods The study included 106 COVID-19 patients, and 51 controls. All patients were positive for COVID-19 infection by nasopharyngeal swab for detection of viral RNA by real-time PCR. In addition to baseline data and radiological findings, the coagulation profile was done with special attention to Fibrinogen, d-dimer, Factor VIII, von Willebrand factor (VWF), Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III (ATIII) and Lupus anticoagulant (LA)-1 and 2. Results The results showed significantly higher VWF, d-dimer, and LA1 (screening) and LA2 (confirmation) in patients than a control group. Significantly higher d-dimer FVIII, VWF and LA1-2 were detected in the severe group. ATIII had high diagnostic accuracy in severity prediction. We found a significantly higher international randomized ratio (INR) and VWF among patients with thrombotic events. For prediction of thrombosis; VWF at cutoff > 257.7 has 83.3% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. Conclusion Patients with COVID-19 infection are vulnerable to different forms of coagulopathy. This could be associated with poor outcomes. d-Dimer is a chief tool in diagnosis, severity evaluation but not thrombosis prediction. Early screening for this complication and its proper management would improve the outcome.

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) was the most common discharge diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorder that places a substantial burden on the healthcare system. The clinical course of most patient with AP is often mild and it often resolves without sequelae. And yet a considerable percentage of people develop severe AP (SAP) that would greatly affect the outcome. The objective of the current study is to assess the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prediction of SAP.

Background and Aim Little is known about the persistence of symptoms after clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study aimed to assess persistent symptoms in COVID-19 patients after clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methodology A multi-center survey was conducted on first wave COVID-19 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including presenting symptoms and persistent symptoms after viral clearance and possible factors contributing to persistence of such symptoms, were collected using an online multicomponent questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed to detect the most persisting symptoms and factors contributing to their persistence. Results Overall, 538 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 41.17 (±SD 14.84), 54.1% were males, and 18.6% were smokers. Hypertension and diabetes were the most reported co-morbidities. Mild symptoms were reported in 61.3% of patients, 51.3% were admitted to hospital and 6.5% were admitted to the intensive care unit. Our study identified 49 types of persisting symptoms. Fatigue (59.1%), sense of fever (46.5%), anorexia (24.3%) and diarrhea (24.3%) were the most commonly reported persisting symptoms followed by loss of taste and smell (22.3%), headache (21.4%), cough (20.8) and dyspnea (21%). The use of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and multivitamins were significantly associated with persistence of symptoms (OR = 8.03, 8.89 and 10.12, respectively). Conclusion Our study revealed that in COVID-19 recovered patients, many patients reported persistence of at least one symptom, particularly fatigue and sense of fever. Follow-up of patients after discharge from hospital is recommended until complete resolution of symptoms.

Background & Aim: Conventional cytological evaluation (CCE) fails to identify nature indeterminate biliary duct stricture (IBDS) in many cases. Digital image analysis (DIA) has the ability to identify and analyze the DNA content of cells. This study assesses the role of DIA in recognizing the nature of IBDS compared to CCE. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Al-Rajhi University Hospital. Fifty patients with IBDS, based on abdominal imaging, were subjected to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and brush sampling. These samples were evaluated with CCE and DIA. Follow-up for at least 9 months and costanalysis had also been done. Results: Based on the final diagnosis, 32 (64.0%) patients had malignant stricture, and 39 (78.0%) had distal stricture. DIA had 84.40% (95% CI; 67.20-94.70) sensitivity and 94.40% (95% CI; 72.70-99.90) specificity in identifying nature of IBDS, whereas CCE had 19.0% (95% CI; 7.20-36.40) sensitivity and 89.0% (95% CI; 65.30-98.60) specificity. Combination of both modalities had 84.40% (95% CI; 67.20-94.70) sensitivity and 83.30% (95% CI; 58.60-96.40) specificity in identification nature of IBDS. Based on CCE alone, only 6/32 ( 18.80%) of malignant stricture were diagnosed, and 26/32 (81.20%) were missed. However, DIA alone was able to diagnose 27/32 (84.40%) of malignant stricture, and only 5 cases were missed. Both procedures had detection rate of malignant stricture as DIA alone. Benign stricture was correctly diagnosed in 16/18 (88.80%), 17/ 18 (94.40%), and 15/18 (83.30%) using CCE alone, DIA alone, and both procedures together, respectively. Cost per detection additional one malignant stricture using DIA required 99.4$. Conclusion: DIA is substantially better than CCE in diagnosing the nature of IBDS but at an increase cost and thus suggests its application in a wider role in clinical practice. Clinical trial number: NCT04112030 (