No abstract

The number of people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes has risen steeply recently exhausting the ability of health care systems to deal with the epidemic. Seventy-five percent of people with diabetes live in low- and middle-income countries. The largest populations of diabetics are in China and India, with many of those people living in extreme poverty. Combined forces of governmental health care, charities and donation of pharmaceutical companies would not be able to cope with the financial demands needed for medicaments and treatments for these people. Therefore, it is worth looking into traditional folk remedies to find if there is any scientific merit to justify their claims for alleviating symptoms of diabetes. There is a traditional belief in the Middle East that regular consumption of camel milk helps in the prevention and control of diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that camel milk can have such properties. Literature review suggests the following possibilities: i) insulin in camel milk possesses special properties that makes absorption into circulation easier than insulin from other sources or cause resistance to proteolysis; ii) camel insulin is encapsulated in nanoparticles (lipid vesicles) that make possible its passage through the stomach and entry into the circulation; iii) some other elements of camel milk make it anti-diabetic. Sequence of camel insulin and its predicted digestion pattern do not suggest differentiability to overcome the mucosal barriers before been degraded and reaching the blood stream. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that insulin in camel milk is present in nanoparticles capable of transporting this hormone into the bloodstream. Although, much more probable is that camel milk contains 'insulin-like' small molecule substances that mimic insulin interaction with its receptor.

There is no significant benefit of tyndalized Lactobacillus acidophilus in acute diarrhea.

BackgroundPneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality under five years of age worldwide. For pneumonia with chest indrawing in children aged 3–59 months, injectable penicillin and hospitalization was the recommended treatment. This increased the health care cost and exposure to nosocomial infections. We compared the clinical and cost outcomes of a seven day treatment with oral amoxicillin with the first 48 h of treatment given in the hospital (hospital group) or at home (home group).MethodsWe conducted an open-label, multi-center, two-arm randomized clinical trial at six tertiary hospitals in India. Children aged 3 to 59 months with chest indrawing pneumonia were randomized to home or hospital group. Clinical outcomes, treatment adherence, and patient safety were monitored through home visits on day 3, 5, 8, and 14 with an additional visit for the home group at 24 h. Clinical outcomes included treatment failure rates up to 7 days (primary outcome) and between 8–14 days (secondary outcome) using the intention to treat and per protocol analyses. Cost outcomes included direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs for a random 17 % subsample using the micro-costing technique.Results1118 children were enrolled and randomized to home (n = 554) or hospital group (n = 564). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Overall treatment failure rate was 11.5 % (per protocol analysis). The hospital group was significantly more likely to fail treatment than the home group in the intention to treat analysis. Predictors with increased risk of treatment failure at any time were age 3–11 months, receiving antibiotics within 48 h prior to enrolment and use of high polluting fuel. Death rates at 7 or 14 days did not differ significantly. (Difference −0.0 %; 95 % CI −0.5 to 0.5). The median total treatment cost was Rs. 399 for the home group versus Rs. 602 for the hospital group (p < 0.001), for the same effect of 5 % failure rate at the end of 7 days of treatment in the random subsample.ConclusionsHome based oral amoxicillin treatment was equivalent to hospital treatment for first 48 h in selected children of chest indrawing pneumonia and was cheaper. Consistent with the recent WHO simplified guidelines, management with home based oral amoxicillin for select children with only fast breathing and chest-indrawing can be a cost effective intervention.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01386840, registered 25th June 2011 and the Indian Council of Medical Research REFCTRI/2010/000629.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0510-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.