Introduction: To evaluate and compare the amount of time required by three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canal during retreatment with hand file as control. Materials and Methods:Eighty human mandibular premolars with single straight root canals were prepared and obturated by cold lateral condensation with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. After two weeks, the 80 teeth were divided into one control group and 3 retreatment groups (n = 20 each). Gutta-percha was removed using H-files, the D-RaCe, or the Mtwo or the R-Endo retreatment systems. Retreatment time was calculated using stopwatch.Results: D-RaCe and Mtwo required significantly less time than R-Endo and hand file. Hand file took maximum time, which was significantly slower than all groups. However, D-RaCe and Mtwo retreatment time was statistically insignificant.Conclusion: D-RaCe and Mtwo remove gutta-percha faster than R-Endo and Hand files.
It is of interest to document data on the push – out bond strength of three different root canal treatment sealers such as MTA Fillapex (MTA based), AH plus (Epoxy Resin based) and Apexit plus (Calcium hydroxide based). Forty-five freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors with closed apices were selected randomly. All the teeth were sectioned at cement-enamel junction using a diamond disc before starting the root canal preparation to obtain root length of 12 mm. All teeth were instrumented using ProTaper rotary instruments. 5.25% sodium hypoclorite was used for irrigation between instrumentation followed by 17% EDTA, and final rinse by saline. Obturation procedures were done using the gutta-percha single cone technique. 45 roots were randomly assigned to 3 groups of 15 for obturation with gutta-percha cones and 1 of the 3 sealers (n=15). Group 1 = MTA Fillapex sealer + gutta-percha: Group 2 = AH plus sealer + gutta-percha: Group 3 = Apexit plus sealer + gutta-percha. The roots were sectioned horizontally to its canal into 3 sections: Coronal, Mid-root and Apical-thirds using a precision cutting machine, with a thickness of 3 mm. The specimens were subjected to push-out test using a universal testing machine that carried a plunger. The loading speed was 1mm/min until the dislodgment of the material occurred. The independent t- test was used to compare the mean scores among the study groups. The level of significance was set at 5% for all tests. After the push-out bond strength test, each sample was evaluated under stereomicroscope (40x) to determine the mode of failure and recorded as one of the following categories: adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The observations thus obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using Student - t test. AH Plus showed significantly higher values than MTA Fillapex and Apexit plus (p < 0.05). Amongst the push-out bond strength AH Plus sealer showed significant difference from MTA Fillapex and Apexit plus groups. There was no significant difference between MTA Fillapex and Apexit plus however (p>0.05). Microscopic analysis displayed that the majority of the modes were cohesive failures for AH Plus, adhesive failures for MTA Fillapex and mixed failures for Apexit Plus. . Thus, AH Plus had the highest bond strength and MTA Fillapex had the lowest bond strength to root dentin. Mean push-out bond strength values were ranked as follows; AH Plus >Apexit Plus > MTA Fillapex. Microscopic analysis displayed that the majority of the modes were cohesive failures of AH Plus, adhesive failures for MTA Fillapex and mixed failures for Apexit Plus.
A 21-years-old female patient presented to our outpatients dental department with pain in lower right back tooth region, which had persisted for one month. Her medical and dental histories were non-contributory. On extraoral examination, no abnormalities were detected, and an intra-oral examination revealed a class II silver amalgam restoration with a secondary deep carious lesion in the mandibular right first molar. On further clinical examination, four maxillary lateral incisors were found [Table/ Fig-1 and 2]. On the clinical and physical examinations of the patient, no symptoms which were related to any syndrome were revealed. The patient's parents and siblings were also examined, and no related findings were observed. The lateral incisors which were located towards the midline were termed as supplemental lateral incisors because they were morphologically similar to the adjacent normal lateral Dentistry Section
Background and Objectives:Endodontic sealer is currently regarded with such importance in the root canal treatment that it is often considered to be more important than the core obturating material itself. Sealer with the least film thickness is favorable for minimizing microleakage. The aim of the study is to compare sealer distribution in root canal using three different sealers with three different obturation techniques.Materials and Methods:AH plus, Fuji-1, Tubliseal Extended Working Time (EWT) was placed into the prepared root canals of 90 maxillary central incisors using a lentulospiral. Thereafter, the canals were obturated using three different gutta-percha root filling techniques (single cone, lateral condensation, vertical condensation). Horizontal sectioning was carried out at 3 mm and 6 mm from the apex with a diamond disk. The two specimens thus obtained were examined for sealer distribution using a stereomicroscope and the percentage of sealer coating the perimeter (PSCP) was calculated using a digital imaging system.Results:A significant difference existed in the mean PSCP values of three different sealers (P < 0.000), where Tubliseal (EWT) had the highest PSCP values followed by the AH plus and Fuji-1. Also, between techniques, differences were observed (P < 0.00), where a single cone technique had the highest mean values followed by lateral condensation and vertical condensation. Between the 3 mm and 6 mm sections a non-significant difference was observed (P < 0.945).Conclusion:Tubliseal EWT showed highest PSCP value and Single cone technique showed the higher PSCP value then lateral and vertical condensation technique at 3 mm and 6 mm sections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.