Combining VBN with CT-TBB significantly improved the diagnostic yield for small PPL.

Objective This study was conducted to investigate whether the add-on treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) based on the Self-assessment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma (SACRA) questionnaire for assessing AR control improves both AR and asthma control in asthmatic patients with AR. Methods This multi-center prospective study was performed in Nagano prefecture, Japan. Two hundred five asthmatic patients and 23 respiratory physicians participated in the study. We administered add-on AR treatments based on the results of the SACRA questionnaire. After the first SACRA questionnaire, 67 asthmatic patients agreed to receive an add-on AR treatment. Three months after the AR treatment, a secondary SACRA questionnaire, asthma control test (ACT), and pulmonary function tests were performed. Results After the add-on AR treatment, the visual analogue scales (VASs) for AR and asthma, as assessed by the SACRA questionnaire and ACT score, were significantly improved in the patients of the AR+ group. With regard to the pulmonary function tests, the percent predicted vital capacity, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second were also significantly improved. Regardless of whether the patients had previously undergone leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) treatment, the VASs for AR and asthma and the ACT score were significantly improved in the AR+ group. However, the vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) were only significantly improved in the AR+ group that had previously undergone LTRA treatment. Conclusion SACRA questionnaire-based add-on AR treatment would be convenient for the detection of AR by respiratory physicians and would offer improved asthma control. This questionnaire can also be used to assess the therapeutic effects.

No abstract

Backgrounds The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the standard treatment for locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer (LA‐NSCLC). However, little is known about the predictive factors of durvalumab efficacy in this population. This study aimed to validate the predictive use of inflammation‐related parameters in patients with LA‐NSCLC treated with CCRT plus durvalumab. Methods We recruited 76 LA‐NSCLC patients who received CCRT followed by durvalumab from 10 Japanese institutions. The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C‐reactive protein‐to‐albumin ratio (CAR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were measured before (pre‐treatment) and 2 months after (post‐treatment) durvalumab induction. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine prognostic factors associated with progression‐free survival (PFS) after durvalumab therapy. Results The median follow‐up time was 17 (range, 3.3–35.8) months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 26.1 and 33.7 months, respectively. Durvalumab was discontinued in 47 (61.8%) patients, with non‐infectious pneumonitis being the most common reason. Post‐treatment CAR (cutoff, 0.2) was a significant stratifying factor in survival comparison (<0.2 vs. ≥ 0.2, median PFS, not‐reached vs. 9.6 months. Log‐rank, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model showed that post‐treatment CAR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio, 3.16, p = 0.003). Conclusions This study suggests that post‐treatment CAR has predictive value for LA‐NSCLC patients treated with CCRT plus durvalumab consolidation therapy.