BACKGROUND: The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most important prognostic factor for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). A D2 gastrectomy has been the gold standard treatment. Strict criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection have been widely accepted in Japan. There are some trials aimed at expanding the indications for local treatment, although there has not been a comprehensive review of the risk of LNM with the lesions of EGC.METHODS: We investigated 5265 patients who had undergone gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for EGC at the National Cancer Center Hospital and the Cancer Institute Hospital. Nine clinicopathological factors were assessed for their possible association with LNM.RESULTS: None of the 1230 well differentiated intramucosal cancers of less than 30 mm diameter regardless of ulceration findings, were associated with metastases (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.3%). None of the 929 lesions without ulceration were associated with nodal metastases (95% CI, 0-0.4%) regardless of tumor size. Similarly to findings for intramucosal cancers, for submucosal lesions, there was a significant correlation between tumor size larger than 30 mm and lymphatic-vascular involvement with an increased risk of LNM. None of the 145 differentiated adenocarcinomas of less than 30-mm-diameter without lymphatic or venous permeation were associated with LNM, provided that the lesion had invaded less than 500 &mgr;m into the submucosa (95% CI, 0-2.5%).CONCLUSION: Based on our large series of cases, we have been able to clarify the risks associated with EGC and to propose expansion of the criteria for local treatment. However, accurate histological evaluation of the resected specimens is essential to avoid recurrence for such EGCs that should be cured.

No abstract

Diagnostic and treatment strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have evolved greatly since the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies. Although several clinical practice guidelines are extant, such as those published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Medical Oncology, it is not clear as to whether these are appropriate for clinical practice in Japan. Therefore, clinical practice guidelines for the optimal diagnosis and treatment of GIST tailored for the Japanese situation have often been requested. For this reason, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for GIST was proposed by the GIST Guideline Subcommittee, with the official approval of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee for Cancer of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), and was published after assessment by the Guideline Evaluation Committee of JSCO. The GIST Guideline Subcommittee consists of members from JSCO, the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA), and the Japanese Study Group on GIST, with the official approval of these organizations. The GIST Guideline Subcommittee is not influenced by any other organizations or third parties. Revision of the guideline may be done periodically, with the approval of the GIST Guideline Subcommittee, either every 3 years or when important new evidence that might alter the optimal diagnosis and treatment of GIST emerges. Here we present the English version of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for GIST prepared by the GIST Guideline Subcommittee.

No abstract

At the 30th year anniversary, the Japan Pancreas Society nationwide pancreatic cancer registry is more shining than ever for current perspectives and for future diagnostic and treatment tactics.