Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes patients to cancer and is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Identifying the deleterious mutation, such as a frameshift or nonsense mutation, is important for confirming an LS diagnosis. However, discovery of a missense variant is often inconclusive. The effects of these variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on disease pathogenesis are unclear, though understanding their impact on protein function can help determine their significance. Laboratory functional studies performed to date have been limited by their artificial nature. We report here an in‐cellulo functional assay in which we engineered site‐specific MSH2 VUS using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats‐Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells. This approach introduces the variant into the endogenous MSH2 loci, while simultaneously eliminating the wild‐type gene. We characterized the impact of the variants on cellular MMR functions including DNA damage response signaling and the repair of DNA microsatellites. We classified the MMR functional capability of eight of 10 VUS providing valuable information for determining their likelihood of being bona fide pathogenic LS variants. This human cell‐based assay system for functional testing of MMR gene VUS will facilitate the identification of high‐risk LS patients.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition condition caused by inactivating germline mutations in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Identifying a deleterious germline mutation by DNA sequencing is important for confirming an LS diagnosis. Frameshift and nonsense mutations significantly alter the protein product and likely impair MMR function. However, the implication of a missense mutation is often difficult to interpret. Referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), their discovery hampers the definitive LS diagnosis. To determine the pathogenic significance of a VUS it is helpful to know its impact on protein function. Functional studies in the test tube and in cellular models have been performed for some VUS, however, these studies have been limited by the artificial nature of the assays. We report here an improved functional assay in which we engineered site-specific MSH2 VUS using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells. This approach introduces the variant into the endogenous MSH2 loci, while simultaneously eliminating the wild-type gene. We then characterized the impact of the variants on cellular MMR functions including DNA damage response signaling upon challenge with a DNA alkylating agent and the repair of DNA microsatellites. We classified the MMR functional capability of 8 of 10 VUS under study providing valuable information for determining their likelihood of being bona fide LS mutations. This improved human cell-based assay system for functionally testing MMR gene VUS will facilitate the identification of high risk LS patients. Significance StatementUnderstanding how cancer-associated missense variants in MMR genes affect function helps determine whether they truly contribute to disease. Laboratory assays previously utilized are limited by their artificial nature. To improve this, we introduced variants directly into the endogenous MMR loci in hESCs using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. This approach allows us to assess each variant while being expressed by its normal regulatory elements in a cellular environment. Our results will help guide the management of patients world-wide who carry these variants. At the same time, this study provides a technical road map for assessing the functional effects of all LS-associated variants, as well as variants linked to other genetic diseases where a cell-based functional assay is available.

While mathematics anxiety (MA) has been widely researched in recent decades, this study addresses significant gaps: namely, research that explores the relationship between MA and self‐reported mathematics experiences; samples adults with a range of MA levels; and controls for general anxiety. Additionally, the study sampled deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students, whose diverse life and educational experiences often differ from hearing students’. We investigated whether DHH students’ experiences with mathematics (i.e., parental behaviors, school environment, and mathematics feelings) and demographic variables (i.e., hearing status, age, and gender) predict their MA, and whether these relationships differ from those in hearing students. Self‐report questionnaires were completed by 296 DHH and hearing college students. Linear regression analyses controlling for general anxiety led to the following inference: DHH students who reported more positive attitudes toward mathematics and school environments demonstrated higher MA. Also, the relationships between mathematics feelings, parental behaviors, and MA differed between DHH and hearing students. Logistic regression analyses showed no contribution of MA to students’ likelihood of pursuing STEM degrees in either DHH or between DHH and hearing groups. Overall, this work breaks new ground in the study of MA in DHH students and challenges standard views of the relationships between MA and individual experiences.