From a biological standpoint, the best material for reconstruction of bone defects is the autogenous bone graft. However, as tissue healing is affected under diabetic conditions, major changes might take place in the revascularization, incorporation, replacement and remodeling phases of the grafted area. The purpose of this study was to assess the bone healing process in surgical wounds prepared in tibiae of diabetic rats and filled with autogenous bone. Forty male rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar) were randomly assigned to receive an endovenous injection (penile vein) of either citrate buffer solution (Group 1 - control; n=20) or streptozotocin dissolved in citrate buffer solution (35 mg/kg) to induce diabetes (Group 2 - diabetic; n=20). After determination of glycemia, the animals were anesthetized and the anterolateral regions of the tibiae of both limbs were shaved, antisepsis was performed and longitudinal incisions were made in each limb. The tibiae were exposed and two 2-mm-diameter surgical cavities were prepared: one in the right limb, filled with particulate autogenous bone and the other in the left limb, filled with blood clot. The animals were euthanized at 10 and 30 postoperative days. The anatomic pieces were obtained, submitted to laboratory processing and sections were stained by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's Trichrome for histomorphologic and histometric analyses. In both groups, the wounds filled with autogenous bone graft showed better results than those filled with blood clot. The control group showed higher new bone formation in wounds filled with autogenous bone graft at 30 days than the diabetic group, but without statistical significance. It may be concluded that, in general, the new bone formation occurred with autogenous graft was quantitatively similar between control and diabetic groups and qualitatively better in the control group.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to perform histological and histometric analyses of
the repair process of autogenous bone grafts fixed at rat calvaria with
ethyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive. Material and MethodsThirty-two rats were divided into two groups (n=16), Group I - Control and Group
II - Adhesive. Osteotomies were made at the right parietal bone for graft
obtainment using a 4-mm-diameter trephine drill. Then, the bone segments were
fixed with the adhesive in the parietal region of the opposite side to the donor
site. After 10 and 30 days, 8 animals of each group were euthanized and the
calvarias were laboratorially processed for obtaining hematoxylin and
eosin-stained slides for histological and histometric analyses. ResultsAn intense inflammatory reaction was observed at the 10-day period. At 30 days,
this reaction was less intense, despite the presence of adhesive at the
recipient-site/graft interface. Graft incorporation to the recipient site was
observed only at the control group, which maintained the highest graft size at 10
and 30 days. ConclusionsAlthough the fragment was stable, the presence of adhesive in Group II did not
allow graft incorporation to the recipient site, determining a localized, discrete
and persistent inflammatory reaction.
This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official duties cannot be copyrighted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.