Hispanics/Latinos are the largest ethnic/racial group in the United States and at high risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). Yet, ADRD among diverse Latinos is poorly understood and disparately understudied or unstudied compared to other ethnic/racial groups that leave the nation ill-prepared for major demographic shifts that lay ahead in coming decades. The primary purpose of this Perspectives article was to provide a new research framework for advancing Latino ADRD knowledge, encompassing the unique sociocultural, cardiometabolic, and genomic aspects of Latino health, aging, and ADRD. In addition, we describe some of the research challenges to progress in Latino ADRD research. Finally, we present the Study of Latinos -Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging (SOL-INCA) as an example of implementing this new framework for advancing Latino ADRD research.

Introduction: We estimated the prevalence and correlates of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among middle-aged and older diverse Hispanics/Latinos. Methods: Middle-aged and older diverse Hispanics/Latinos enrolled (n 5 6377; 50-86 years) in this multisite prospective cohort study were evaluated for MCI using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria. Results: The overall MCI prevalence was 9.8%, which varied between Hispanic/Latino groups. Older age, high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and elevated depressive symptoms were significant correlates of MCI prevalence. Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE) and APOE2 were not significantly associated with MCI.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is linked to cognitive decline and disorders (e.g., dementia). The evidence is based largely on older non-Latino White cohorts. Objective: Examine the association between global vascular risk and cognitive function among Hispanics/Latinos in the United States. Methods: We used data from a large sample of stroke-and cardiovascular disease-free, middle-aged and older Hispanics/Latinos with diverse backgrounds (n = 7,650) from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). We compared associations between two measures of cardiovascular risk (CVR), the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (FCRS) and the multiethnic Global Vascular Risk Score (GVRS), and cognitive performance using measures of global and domain specific cognitive function, and tested for modification by sex and age.

Group work in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses is an effective means of improving student outcomes, and many different factors can influence the dynamics of student discussions and, ultimately, the success of collaboration. The substance and dynamics of group discussions are commonly examined using qualitative methods such as discourse analysis. To complement existing work in the literature, we developed a quantitative methodology that uses graph theory to map the progression of talk-turns of discussions within a group. We observed groups of students working with peer facilitators to solve problems in biological sciences, with three iterations of data collection and two major refinements of graph theory calculations. Results include general behaviors based on the turns in which different individuals talk and graph theory parameters to quantify group characteristics. To demonstrate the potential utility of the methodology, we present case studies with distinct patterns: a centralized group in which the peer facilitator behaves like an authority figure, a decentralized group in which most students talk their fair share of turns, and a larger group with subgroups that have implications for equity, diversity, and inclusion. Together, these results demonstrate that our adaptation of graph theory is a viable quantitative methodology to examine group discussions.

Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is the experience of cognitive decline not yet apparent through formal neuropsychological testing. SCD is required to meet clinical criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and is a potential early risk marker of neurocognitive changes. Despite increased risk of cognitive decline in US Hispanics/Latinos, SCD research in this group is lacking. We investigated if SCD is cross‐sectionally associated with objective neurocognitive performance in SOL‐INCA, a large community‐based sample of diverse Hispanics/Latinos. Method Participants (N=5,282) were age 50+ and without reported dementia. The Everyday Cognition Short Form (ECog‐12) scale measured SCD. A global score, as well as memory and executive ECog‐12 sub‐scale scores, were calculated by averaging across z‐scores of individual items assessing memory and executive functional abilities (all items were averaged for the global score). Objective neurocognitive function was measured with tests of memory (Spanish English Verbal Learning Test‐Sum and Recall scores) and executive functions (word fluency, Trail Making Test A & B, and Digit Symbol Substitution scores). Memory, executive, and global neurocognitive composite scores were created by averaging across z‐scores for each cognitive domain listed above, and across all tests for the global composite. Regression models interrogated associations of ECog‐12 (global and sub‐scale scores) with their respective objective neurocognitive function counterparts (global cognition, memory, and executive function neurocognitive composite scores), adjusting for age, sex, education, Hispanic/Latino background, depression, anxiety, and cardiovascular risk factors. Result Women comprised 53% of the sample and 25% of the sample were age 70+. Global score, memory, and executive sub‐scale ECog‐12 scores were significantly associated with global (B= ‐0.14), memory (B= ‐0.11), and executive function (B= ‐0.11) neurocognitive composite scores respectively (all p‐values <.001), such that higher ECog‐12 scores (more complaints) were related to lower neurocognition for all three neurocognitive composites. Conclusion Contrary to previous research in non‐Hispanic Whites, SCD is associated with concurrent objective neurocognitive function among Hispanic/Latino community‐dwelling adults. SCD may have utility as an early risk marker in this population. More research is needed to determine the predictive value of SCD reporting within Hispanics/Latinos as well as the utility of informant’s report in predicting neurocognitive change.