No abstract

BackgroundExisting psychological therapies for bipolar disorders have been found to have mixed results, with a consensus that they provide a significant, but modest, effect on clinical outcomes. Typically, these approaches have focused on promoting strategies to prevent future relapse. An alternative treatment approach, termed ‘Think Effectively About Mood Swings’ (TEAMS) addresses current symptoms, including subclinical hypomania, depression and anxiety, and promotes long-term recovery. Following the publication of a theoretical model, a range of research studies testing the model and a case series have demonstrated positive results. The current study reports the protocol of a feasibility randomized controlled trial to inform a future multi-centre trial.Methods/DesignA target number of 84 patients with a diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder, or bipolar disorder not-otherwise-specified are screened, allocated to a baseline assessment and randomized to either 16 sessions of TEAMS therapy plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU. Patients complete self-report inventories of depression, anxiety, recovery status and bipolar cognitions targeted by TEAMS. Assessments of diagnosis, bipolar symptoms, medication, access to services and quality of life are conducted by assessors blind to treatment condition at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization. The main aim is to evaluate recruitment and retention of participants into both arms of the study, as well as adherence to therapy, to determine feasibility and acceptability. It is predicted that TEAMS plus TAU will reduce self-reported depression in comparison to TAU alone at six months post-randomization. The secondary hypotheses are that TEAMS will reduce the severity of hypomanic symptoms and anxiety, reduce bipolar cognitions, improve social functioning and promote recovery compared to TAU alone at post-treatment and follow-up. The study also incorporates semi-structured interviews about the experiences of previous treatment and the experience of TEAMS therapy that will be subject to qualitative analyses to inform future developments of the approach.DiscussionThe design will provide preliminary evidence of efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, uptake, attrition and barriers to treatment to design a definitive trial of this novel intervention compared to treatment as usual.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN83928726) on registered 25 July 2014.

No abstract

Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant yeast which has emerged in healthcare facilities worldwide, however little is known about identification methods, patient colonization, spread, environmental survival, and drug resistance. Colonization on both biotic and abiotic surfaces, along with travel, appear to be the major factors for the spread of this pathogen across the globe.In this investigation, we present laboratory findings from an ongoing C. auris outbreak in NY from August 2016 through 2018. A total of 540 clinical isolates, 11,035 patient surveillance specimens, and 3,672 environmental surveillance samples were analyzed. Laboratory methods included matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for yeast isolate identification, real-time PCR for rapid surveillance sample screening, culture on selective/non-selective media for recovery of C. auris and other yeasts from surveillance samples, antifungal susceptibility testing to determine the C. auris resistance profile, and Sanger sequencing of ribosomal genes for C. auris genotyping. Results included: a) identification and confirmation of C. auris in 413 clinical isolates and 931 patient surveillance isolates, as well as identification of 277 clinical cases and 350 colonized cases from 151 healthcare facilities including 59 hospitals, 92 nursing homes, 1 long-term acute care hospital (LTACH), and 2 hospices, b) successful utilization of an in-house developed C. auris real-time PCR assay for the rapid screening of patient and environmental surveillance samples, c) demonstration of relatively heavier colonization of C. auris in nares compared to the axilla/groin, and d) predominance of the South Asia Clade I with intrinsic resistance to fluconazole and elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to voriconazole (81%), amphotericin B