Background Kimura is an uncommon inflammatory cause of pediatric head and neck masses due to eosinophilic infiltration of unclear etiology. Kimura can present similarly to infectious lymphadenitis, a much more common pediatric complaint. This case explores the role of anchoring bias when faced with an illness that at first appears to fit a common illness script that led to a delayed diagnosis. Case presentation A 7-year-old boy presented with acute onset of pre-auricular lymphadenopathy and fevers initially thought to be most consistent with infectious cervical lymphadenopathy. Despite treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics and multiple evaluations for underlying abscess requiring surgical drainage, the patient did not improve and remained febrile. Eventually, excisional lymph node biopsy was obtained and a pathologic diagnosis of Kimura disease was made. Conclusions This case illustrates an uncommon pediatric diagnosis which presented similarly to infectious cervical lymphadenitis without additional laboratory features consistent with Kimura. We highlight the role of anchoring bias and care fragmentation leading to repeat imaging and delayed biopsy in the eventual diagnosis of a rare illness.
Background Physical inactivity is a global health problem. Physically active people show lower rates of chronic diseases or mortality. People with intellectual disabilities (PWID), a vulnerable group for health problems, have significantly lower levels of physical activity (PA) than general population. Due to reduced cognitive abilities, communicative and literacy skills, PWID have less access to health programs. Target-group-oriented interventions are rare. Methods Methodological triangulation to survey PA-related health competences in all 3 subcategories: 3 participating observations and 24 interviews with PWID (inclusion criteria for both: mild or moderate ID); staff online survey (n = 67), all in an integration assistance institution. Participatory approach: 2 expert groups with PWID advise researchers e.g. validating results. Results As expected, movement abilities and body awareness various highly from general population. An effect knowledge is widely spread (PA = health), but execution knowledge of PA is only marginally available e.g. not knowing how to increase PA healthy. Control competences as results from interview and observations: intrinsic motivation is highly present (unlike results from staff survey), but volition - self-efficacy and bring into action - is very poor, self-management and a lack of ideas are identified as a major problem. Low expectation of self-efficacy proved to be the biggest obstacles for PA, but caregiver are an own health resource. Expert groups confirm important of PWID perspectives on living environment. Conclusions To promote a PA lifestyle, health education with a focus on promoting self-efficacy orientated to the living environment (incl. caregiver) regarding own perspectives and health resources is needed. In this way, a vulnerable group for health problems can be empowered. Results indicate a successful approach to promote PA-related health competences in PWID to minimize health inequalities in relation to general population. Key messages Health inequalities among people with intellectual disability through promoting a PA lifestyle can be minimized. Intervention for people with intellectual disabilities must take into account the perspectives and the resources of the users.
Date Presented 4/8/2016 In this quantitative, nonexperimental investigation, a researcher-designed questionnaire was used to identify self-perceived barriers preventing older adults from using public transportation in one large county of the San Francisco Bay Area. Primary Author and Speaker: Alexandra Mauro Additional Authors and Speakers: Regan Kyler, Megan Chang, Matthew Heffernan Contributing Authors: Carolyn Glogoski, Alice Chen, Brien Bowles
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.