Children with medical complexity (CMC) have an increased risk of adverse events after hospital discharge. Authors of previous studies have evaluated discharge communication practices with primary care providers (PCPs) in adults and general pediatric patients. There is a lack of evidence surrounding hospitalist communication practices at discharge for CMC. In this study, we explore hospitalist-to-PCP communication for CMC at hospital discharge.METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single tertiary care children's hospital. The population included patients with $1 complex chronic condition who were discharged from the pediatric hospitalist team. The presence, type, and quality of discharge communication were collected. A descriptive analysis in which we used x 2 , t test, Wilcoxon rank testing, and odds ratios was conducted to identify differences in communication practices in CMC. RESULTS:We identified 368 eligible patients and reviewed their electronic medical records. Discharge communication was documented for 59% of patient encounters. Communication was less likely to occur for patients with technology dependence (P 5 .01), older patients (P 5 .02), and those who were admitted to a teaching service (P 5 .04). The quality of discharge summaries did not change for patients with technology dependence compared with patients without technology dependence.CONCLUSIONS: Communication with the PCP at discharge was less likely to be documented in children with technology dependence. Hospitalists may encounter barriers in completion of appropriate and timely discharge communication with PCPs for CMC. Consistent handoff processes could be used to improve care for our patients with enhanced coordination needs.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and implementation of a Peer Curbside Consult Service (PCCS) for a pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division. METHODS: We developed a pilot intervention with hospitalists at a freestanding children’s hospital to provide peer consultation services for challenging clinical cases. Postconsultation surveys collected from both the requesting and consulting hospitalists provided feedback about the program. The 12-point Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist is used to describe the process for program creation and implementation. RESULTS: The PCCS has provided 60 consultations in the first 2 years since implementation in April 2020 and supports a large PHM division with >75 members who practice at a tertiary care, freestanding children’s hospital and 7 affiliate sites. Hospitalists request peer consultation for challenging clinical cases. The consultations were typically conducted in person or via telephone. Currently, 11 PHM faculty members within the division volunteer as consultants, with 2 assigned per week. Electronic postconsultation experience surveys were received from 70% of requesting and 89% of consultant hospitalists. We also provide preliminary data from this pilot intervention in the Supplemental Information. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established a peer consult service that provided just-in-time clinical decision support across the various practice sites. Through transparent reporting using the TIDieR checklist, other divisions may be able to replicate and adapt their own peer consult program.

Background Kimura is an uncommon inflammatory cause of pediatric head and neck masses due to eosinophilic infiltration of unclear etiology. Kimura can present similarly to infectious lymphadenitis, a much more common pediatric complaint. This case explores the role of anchoring bias when faced with an illness that at first appears to fit a common illness script that led to a delayed diagnosis. Case presentation A 7-year-old boy presented with acute onset of pre-auricular lymphadenopathy and fevers initially thought to be most consistent with infectious cervical lymphadenopathy. Despite treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics and multiple evaluations for underlying abscess requiring surgical drainage, the patient did not improve and remained febrile. Eventually, excisional lymph node biopsy was obtained and a pathologic diagnosis of Kimura disease was made. Conclusions This case illustrates an uncommon pediatric diagnosis which presented similarly to infectious cervical lymphadenitis without additional laboratory features consistent with Kimura. We highlight the role of anchoring bias and care fragmentation leading to repeat imaging and delayed biopsy in the eventual diagnosis of a rare illness.