Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a common otolaryngology emergency that significantly affects the patient’s quality of life. Although in most cases its etiology remains unknown (idiopathic SSHL), viral infections and vascular compromise constitute the most widely accepted etiopathogenic mechanisms. Specifically, occlusion of the internal auditory artery has been reported in cases of sudden deafness. Thrombotic events following the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine are rare. There have been reports of SSHL following immunization with Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine; however, no etiologic relationship has been established between the two entities yet. We present a unique case of SSHL following the second dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. A 61-year-old female was referred to our department with a four-day history of the right-sided sense of fulness combined with almost complete hearing loss that had started two days after the second dose of Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Pure tone audiometry showed profound right-sided sensorineural hearing loss. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and internal auditory canal and magnetic resonance angiography were both normal. The combination of glucocorticoids and acetylsalicylic acid leads to almost full recovery 15 days after deafness. The COVID-19 era is full of new challenges and clinical dilemmas. In our case, the addition of acetylosalicid acid to the patient’s initial treatment may have contributed to the hearing restoration; however, this fact will remain a hypothesis.

Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is currently the most frequent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related malignancy in high-income countries. Oral HPV16 infection is the cause of HPV-related OPC in more than 90% of cases and is primarily (90%) linked to oral sex. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing the prevalence of oral vaccine-type HPV infection in individuals vaccinated with HPV vaccines and unvaccinated controls. Three databases (MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library), as well as other sources, were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Controlled studies testing the efficacy or effectiveness of licensed HPV vaccines were included. The primary end point was multiple oral HPV infections in one individual with low-risk and high-risk types. Secondary end point was the number of oral HPV16 infections. Six studies-2 randomized controlled trials and 4 cross-sectional studies-with a total of 15,240 participants were included in a meta-analysis, which showed that vaccinated individuals were 46% (risk ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.91) less likely to develop oral vaccine-type HPV infection (P = 0.02). A second meta-analysis of 4 studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 3 cross-sectional studies) and 13.285 participants showed 80% (risk ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.43) less likelihood of oral HPV16 infection (P < 0.0001). This study suggests that HPV vaccines can protect against oral vaccine-type HPV infection including high-risk HPV16 infection, thus reducing the incidence of HPV-related OPC. Vaccination against HPV, especially in males, who are predominantly affected by HPV-related OPC, could result in the prevention of this disease.

Purpose of reviewTo assess the impact of benign and malignant sinonasal tumors and their management on patients' Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). Recent findingsAlthough there is a growing consensus that endoscopic surgical management in carefully selected patients with sinonasal tumors is at least as (and probably more) effective than open resection, it is not clear to what extent this translates to better QOL outcomes. Earlier studies reported better outcomes in the emotional and physical function domains after endoscopic resection, and it seems that postsurgical morbidity is less in endoscopic compared to open approaches. QoL after endoscopic surgery for sinonasal and anterior skull base tumors seems to improve within several months of surgery in both benign and malignant tumor groups. However, patients with benign sinonasal tumors have a higher QOL pre and post operatively compared to those with malignancy mainly due to absence of (neo) -adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Factors that seem to be associated with worse QoL include > 60 years, less than 6 months from surgery, prior and adjuvant chemo and radiotherapy, smoking history, advanced staging and malignancy. SummaryThere is not a universally accepted PROM for use in patients with sinonasal benign and malignant tumors: A variety of different PROMs have been used with different degrees of effectiveness. Most likely a combination of disease-specific (such as SNOT 22 and anterior skull base questionnaire) and generic (such as Short Form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) and Karnofsky Performance Status) health outcome measures provide the most insight into QOL of patients with sinonasal tumors. QOL of these patients appears to undergo a bimodal impact with patients experiencing an initial dip in QOL after surgical treatment followed by a slow improvement over time. However, while patients with benign tumors' return to their status quo ante QOL, this is not the case for patients with malignant tumors who stabilize at a lower than initially QOL. To a large extent this seems to be the effect of (neo) adjuvant chemo radiotherapy.

Adenoviral infections in immunocompromised individuals may be life-threatening conditions. The aim of this review is to document all the reported cases of adenoviral infection is patients having undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT). A comprehensive literature search of the databases Pubmed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify all the case reports of adenoviral infections in BMT patients. A total of 30 articles with 44 patients were included. The most common underlying condition was acute lymphocytic leukemia (23%) followed by acute myeloid leukemia (18%). The most common site of infection was disseminated (50%), followed by liver infection (8%) and hemorrhagic cystitis (8%). Cidofovir was administered in 40.9% of the cases, and death was reported in 34.4% of them. Ribavirin was administered as monotherapy in 15.9% of patients, with a mortality rate of 57.1%. We found that the antiviral drug option had no statistically significant effect on the mortality rate (p=0.242). Also, the absence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was not associated with an improved outcome (p=0.523). There was, however, a statistically significant difference in the outcome based on the site of infection (p=0.005), with a higher rate of mortality in the disseminated and gastrointestinal cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review documenting all the cases of adenoviral infections in BMT patients. Future randomized studies are needed to validate the results of the present study.

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of salvage total laryngectomy and identify areas for further improvement. Method A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy between January 1999 and December 2018 was performed. Results Thirty-one patients were identified. The most common primary tumour site was the glottis (83.8 per cent). Early stage (T1–T2) disease was identified in 83.9 per cent of cases. Overall survival at 2 and 5 years post-salvage total laryngectomy was 71 per cent and 45 per cent, respectively. Disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years post-salvage total laryngectomy was 65 per cent and 42 per cent, respectively. The rate of post-salvage total laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula was 29 per cent. Conclusion More than half of patients will not survive beyond five years after salvage total laryngectomy. Regional recurrence was the most common form of failure and death. From this study, elective lateral and central neck dissection is advocated in patients with early laryngeal cancer who present with an advanced recurrence.