Relapsing human malaria is regarded to be caused by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale. P. vivax relapses originate from dormant liver stages: "hypnozoites". Also, P. ovale, a species considered as closely related to P. vivax, is in analogy assumed to display hypnozoites. A close biologic relationship is, however, not supported by molecular genetic studies. Therefore, original literature published since the description of P. ovale in 1922 was systematically screened for the demonstration of hypnozoites or circumstantial evidence for their existence, i.e. the occurrence of true relapses. In P. ovale infection, hypnozoites have never been demonstrated by biological experiments, and the few reports published on relapses have conflicting results.

Malaria recurrences after an initially successful therapy and malarial fever occurring a long time after infection are well-known problems in malariology. Currently, two distinct types of malaria recurrences are defined: recrudescence and relapse. A recrudescence is thought to originate from circulating Plasmodium blood stages which do not cause fever before a certain level of a microscopically detectable parasitemia is reached. Contrary, a relapse is thought to originate from quiescent intracellular hepatic parasite stages called hypnozoites. Recrudescences would typically occur in infections due to Plasmodium falciparum. Plasmodium knowlesi, and Plasmodium malariae, whereas relapses would be caused exclusively by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale. This schematic view is, however, insufficiently supported by experimental evidence. For instance, hypnozoites of P. ovale have never been experimentally documented. On the other hand, the nonfinding of P. malariae hypnozoites turned into the proof for the nonexistence of P. malariae hypnozoites. Clinical relapse-type recurrences have been observed in both P. ovale and P. malariae infections, and decade-long incubation times have also been reported in P. falciparum infections. We propose a gradual hypothesis in accordance with the continuity concept of biological evolution: both, relapse and recrudescence may be potentially caused by all Plasmodium spp. We hypothesize that the difference between the various Plasmodium spp. is quantitative rather than qualitative: there are Plasmodium spp. which frequently cause relapses such as P. vivax, particularly the P.v. Chesson strain, species which cause relapses less frequently, such as P. ovale and sometimes P. malariae, and species which may exceptionally cause relapses such as P. falciparum. All species may cause recrudescences. As clinical consequences, we propose that 8-aminquinolines may be considered in a relapse-type recrudescence regardless of the causal Plasmodium sp., whereas primaquine relapse prevention might not be routinely indicated in malaria due to P. ovale.

Quartan malaria due to Plasmodium malariae is commonly regarded as being preventable by current antimalarials. A case of P. malariae infection occurred in spite of previous treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria 4 months earlier with a full therapy course of intravenous quinine hydrochloride and oral doxycycline followed by artemether + lumefantrine. Since the patient was not anymore exposed to agents of malaria in the meantime, a new infection by P. malariae after therapy is unlikely. The present observation is difficult to explain by the current view on the origin of latent P. malariae infections and recurrences which are thought to arise from intra-erythrocytic development stages susceptible to common antimalarials. The most likely explanation of our observation is a delayed pre-erythrocytic development. The latency between infection by P. malariae and the quartan malaria fever attack might have been extended further by an initial subclinical circulation of a low number of intra-erythrocytic asexual parasites in the blood stream preceeding the clinical quartan malaria breakthrough.

Germany's transition from an agrarian to an industrial society (c. 1870-1914) coincided with a change from extensive to intensive use of labour: instead of short-term exhaustion of the proletariat by work (the Manchester School), it became necessary to secure permanently a labour reserve of sufficient quality and numbers.' Towns and factories grew apace during industrialization. The industrial towns were swamped by unforeseen social problems: apart from infrastructural needs such as drainage and water-supply, towns wrestled with the massive problems of housing shortages, lack of food and clothing, infectious disease and malnutrition (especially among mothers and children) and last, but not least, the inadequacy of the workers' own behaviour as a response to the new structures of their lives.For the 'freed' and 'alienated' working population, industrialization meant a hitherto unimaginable change in their traditional pattern of life.While the new life in the industrial towns offered new chances and new freedoms, it also held new dangers. Workers and their families abandoned the 'natural' behavioural guidelines of their country origins and their 'natural' knowledge in their encounters with sickness, invalidity, old age and death. In addition, they lost the systems of bonds and supports previously represented by relatives, landowners, co-operatives and villages. Large existential communities were reduced to small industrial family units. At the same time, the worker was thrown back on his labour as his only means of subsistence, with the result that for more and more people health and productive strength assumed ever greater importance. On the other hand, the dangers to health in the industrial areas were high: 2 tuberculosis, which was rampant in the towns and cities, was known as a 'proletarian disease', pure and simple.

No abstract