The consumption behavior of new medications and the economic implications for Colombia can be demonstrated. In particular, the growth in the consumption of medications for chronic diseases can be seen, which would represent an increase of US $22.6 million per month to the entire population of the country.

No abstract

No abstract

Populations of amphibians and reptiles are experiencing new or increasing threats to their survival. Many of these threats are directly attributable to human activity and resource development. This presents the increasing need for worldwide amphibian and reptile assessments and effective, standardized monitoring protocols. Adaptive management techniques can assist managers in identifying and mitigating threats to amphibian and reptile populations. In 1996, Shell Prospecting and Development, Peru initiated a natural gas exploration project in the rainforest of southeastern Peru. The Smithsonian Institution's Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program worked closely with Shell engineers and managers to establish an adaptive management program to protect the region's biodiversity. In this manuscript, we discuss the steps we took to establish an adaptive management program for amphibian and reptile communities in the region. We define and outline the conceptual issues involved in establishing an assessment and monitoring program, including setting objectives, evaluating the results and making appropriate decisions. We also provide results from the assessment and discuss the appropriateness and effectiveness of protocols and criteria used for selecting species to monitor.

Background The use of medical technology may result in damage to patients. The aim was to determine which adverse events and adverse incidents related to medical–surgical devices were most frequently observed in patients seen at 65 health service providers, clinics and hospitals in Colombia. Methods Retrospective study describing reports of adverse events or incidents related to medical devices between 2014 and 2017. From the database of reports, all cases were identified and classified by the type of device, causes and time of identification of the event. Results The devices that were most frequently reported as having events or adverse incidents were those belonging to the vascular access category, with 45.2% of cases, followed by surgical equipment, with 20.2%. The causes of the events or adverse incidents were most often failures of the mechanical components, at 50.6%, followed by manufacturing defects, at 28.7%. The professionals who reported these issues most frequently were nurses, who did so in 33.1% of the cases. A total of 86.8% of the reports were non-serious adverse events, and the failure was identified at the time of device use in 72.8% of the cases. Conclusions Preventive approaches to events and adverse events related to medical devices can mostly be resolved through stricter quality control measures.