Perineural invasion (PNI) has been implicated as a poor prognostic indicator in many cancers. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends consideration of observation or adjuvant therapy in the presence of PNI in early colon cancer. These recommendations are based on single institutional studies that fail to evaluate PNI within the context of adjuvant chemotherapy. The US National Cancer Database (2004-2012) was reviewed for patients with node negative colon cancer, and stratified by PNI and receipt of chemotherapy. Of 21,488 patients evaluated, 55.2% had T3 disease (n = 11,852), 23.1% had T2 (n = 4,971), 14.4% had T1 (n = 3,088), and 7.3% had T4 disease (n = 1,577); 4.6% (n = 987) had PNI. Most patients (86.8%, n = 18,641) did not have PNI and did not receive chemotherapy; 8.7% (n = 1,860) did not have PNI but received chemotherapy; 3.7% (n = 785) had PNI and did not receive chemotherapy, and 0.9% (n = 202) had PNI and received chemotherapy. Among those with PNI, patients who received chemotherapy tended to be younger (P<0.001), covered by private insurance (P<0.001), with fewer comorbidities (P<0.001), and greater T stage disease (P<0.001). Those with PNI who received chemotherapy had significantly improved survival over those who did not in T3-4 disease (P<0.001), but not in T1-2 disease. On multivariate analysis, those with PNI had a 38% greater hazard of mortality (HR 1.38, P<0.001). Additionally, chemotherapy decreased the hazard of mortality by 43% (HR 0.57, P<0.001). PNI appears to be an independent poor prognostic indicator in stage T3-4 node negative colon cancer. Chemotherapy administered to this patient population is associated with improved survival.

Background Multiple international organizations have called for exercise to become standard practice in the setting of oncology care. The feasibility of integrating exercise within systemic chemotherapy has not been investigated. Methods Patients slated to receive infusion therapy between April 2017 and October 2018 were screened for possible inclusion. The study goal was to establish the acceptability and feasibility of embedding an exercise professional into the chemotherapy infusion suite as a method of making exercise a standard part of cancer care. The exercise prescriptions provided to patients were individualized according to results of brief baseline functional testing. Results In all, 544 patients were screened, and their respective treating oncologists deemed 83% of them to be medically eligible to participate. After further eligibility screening, 226 patients were approached. Nearly 71% of these patients (n = 160) accepted the invitation to participate in the Exercise in All Chemotherapy trial. Feasibility was established because 71%, 55%, 69%, and 63% of the aerobic, resistance, balance, and flexibility exercises prescribed to patients were completed. Qualitative data also supported the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention from the perspective of patients and clinicians. The per‐patient cost of the intervention was $190.68 to $382.40. Conclusions Embedding an exercise professional into the chemotherapy infusion suite is an acceptable and feasible approach to making exercise standard practice. Moreover, the cost of the intervention is lower than the cost of other common community programs. Future studies should test whether colocating an exercise professional with infusion therapy could reach more patients in comparison with not colocating. Lay Summary Few studies have tested the implementation of exercise for patients with cancer by embedding an exercise professional directly into the chemotherapy infusion suite. The Exercise in All Chemotherapy trial shows that this approach is both acceptable and feasible from the perspective of clinicians and patients.

Colon adenocarcinoma is one of the most common malignancies, and it is highly lethal. Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of colon cancer at various stages of the disease. The gut microbiome has emerged as a key player in colon cancer development and progression, and it can also alter the therapeutic agent’s efficacy and toxicities. Antibiotics can directly and/or indirectly affect the balance of the gut microbiome and, therefore, the clinical outcomes. In this article, we provided an overview of the composition of the gut microbiome under homeostasis and the mechanistic links between gut microbiota and colon cancer. The relationship between the use of oral antibiotics and colon cancer, as well as the impact of the gut microbiome on the efficacy and toxicities of chemotherapy in colon cancer, are discussed. Potential interventions to modulate microbiota and improve chemotherapy outcomes are discussed. Further studies are indicated to address these key gaps in the field and provide a scientific basis for the design of novel microbiota-based approaches for prevention/use as adjuvant therapeutics for patients with colon cancer.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy has improved survival for many patients with breast cancer. Unfortunately, such treatment can come at a price, in particular, malignancies. We present a case of a 36-yearold woman with heterozygous mutations in the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene who was admitted to the hospital for fatigue and diffusely scattered bruises. She was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast and had bilateral mastectomy with axillary node clearance followed by adjuvant chemotherapy 3 years prior. Her vitals were stable. Lab tests revealed thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, and anemia. Peripheral blood smear and bone marrow biopsy revealed numerous myeloblasts. After flow cytometry and FISH analysis were performed, a diagnosis of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) was made. The patient was treated with induction chemotherapy and a bone marrow biopsy revealed residual disease. Re-induction therapy was given and a bone marrow biopsy revealed complete remission. She subsequently received an allogenic stem cell transplant and was cured. Her treatment course was uncomplicated. We raise the question as to whether certain chemotherapy agents should be avoided in patients with mutations in DNA repair genes. Furthermore, it is essential for physicians to educate patients on the risk of secondary malignancies arising from chemotherapeutic treatment.