ObjectiveWe surveyed UK practice and compliance with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘recent-onset chest pain’ guidance (Clinical Guideline 95, 2016) as a service quality initiative. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and efficacy of CT coronary angiography (CTCA), NICE-guided investigation compliance, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) use and revascularisation.MethodsA prospective analysis was conducted in nine UK centres between January 2018 and March 2020. The reporter decided whether the CTCA was diagnostic. Coronary artery disease was recorded with the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). Local electronic records and picture archiving/communication systems were used to collect data regarding functional testing, ICA and revascularisation. Duplication of coronary angiography without revascularisation was taken as a surrogate for ICA overuse.Results5293 patients (mean age, 57±12 years; body mass index, 29±6 kg/m²; 50% men) underwent CTCA, with a 96% diagnostic scan rate. 618 (12%) underwent ICA, of which 48% (298/618) did not receive revascularisation. 3886 (73%) had CAD-RADS 0–2, with 1% (35/3886) undergoing ICA, of which 94% (33/35) received ICA as a second-line test. 547 (10%) had CAD-RADS 3, with 23% (125/547) undergoing ICA, of which 88% (110/125) chose ICA as a second-line test, with 26% (33/125) leading to revascularisation. For 552 (10%) CAD-RADS 4 and 91 (2%) CAD-RADS 5 patients, ICA revascularisation rates were 64% (221/345) and 74% (46/62), respectively.ConclusionsWhile CTCA for recent-onset chest pain assessment has been shown to be a robust test, which negates the need for further investigation in three-quarters of patients, subsequent ICA overuse remains with almost half of these procedures not leading to revascularisation.
Multi-detector row cardiac CT imaging demonstrates clinical usefulness in valvular heart disease, for which CT has not been traditionally used. Electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated CT coronary angiography also has an established clinical role with an increasingly solid evidence base, and the same data set in these patients also provides valuable information about chamber and valvular structure and function; this information should also be considered when interpreting cardiac CT and non-ECG gated thoracic imaging. Although true flow data cannot be achieved using CT, as with echocardiography and MRI, there are a number of imaging features that may be used when interpreting and inferring valve pathology. This article discusses the role of currently available imaging modalities and the rationale for cardiac CT, while focusing on the CT interpretation of valvular heart disease with respect to the relevant pathophysiology and management options that have importance to the radiologist. A suggested method of post-processing image review is provided with reference to a variety of normal and pathological pictorial illustrations.
We present a case of a left atrial myxoma infected with Staphylococcus aureus in a 35-year-old woman who was found to have a retained tampon. Multiple systemic septic emboli were seen on computed tomography imaging of the brain, spleen and kidneys. She was successfully treated by surgical excision of the myxoma and 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy. We postulate that the source of this patient's S. aureus infection was tampon use, leading to a toxic shock syndrome and causing infection of an undiagnosed left atrial myxoma, which led to the embolisation. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first reported case of such an entity. In those with an underlying cardiac predisposition, tampon use may represent a risk of infection with S. aureus, and we intend to heighten clinical awareness of this potentially life-threatening association. We also discuss the diagnosis, complications and treatment of infected atrial myxoma and illustrate the imaging findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.