RESUMO Os hormônios sexuais femininos como estrogênio e progesterona têm relação com receptores específicos localizados em regiões cerebrais e podem influenciar o controle motor. Analisou-se o desempenho funcional nas diversas fases do ciclo menstrual em mulheres jovens e saudáveis. O estudo caracteriza-se como transversal e incluiu 13 mulheres saudáveis com ciclo menstrual regular e que não faziam uso de contraceptivo oral. Para a avaliação do desempenho funcional foram utilizados os testes Side Hop Test (SHT), Figure of Eight Hop Test (F8T) e Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) aplicados em três fases do ciclo menstrual (menstrual, ovulatória e lútea). Este estudo estabeleceu diferença significativa para os testes funcionais SHT e F8T entre as fases do ciclo menstrual, com piores resultados para a fase menstrual. O mSEBT não estabeleceu qualquer diferença. Concluiu-se que o desempenho funcional nos testes SHT e F8T foi significativamente pior na fase menstrual, quando comparado à ovulatória e lútea. Estes resultados podem ser considerados para avaliação e prescrição de condutas fisioterapêuticas para mulheres na fase menstrual, já que seu desempenho funcional pode estar comprometido.

No abstract

BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical motor excitability and improve bradykinesia symptoms in Parkinson's disease. It is unclear how targeting different cortical motor areas with tDCS may differentially influence upper limb function for individuals diagnosed with PD.ObjectiveThis study investigated whether anodal tDCS applied separately to the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area would improve upper limb function for individuals with Parkinson's disease. In addition, a startling acoustic stimulus was used to differentiate between the effect of stimulation on motor preparatory and initiation processes associated with upper limb movements.MethodsEleven participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease performed two upper limb simple reaction time tasks, involving elbow extension or a button press before and after either anodal tDCS or sham tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex or supplementary motor area. A loud, startling stimulus was presented on a selection of trials to involuntarily trigger the prepared action.ResultsAnodal tDCS led to improved premotor reaction time in both tasks, but this was moderated by reaction time in pre-tDCS testing, such that individuals with slower pre-tDCS reaction time showed the greatest reaction time improvements. Startle-trial reaction time was not modified following tDCS, suggesting that the stimulation primarily modulated response initiation processes.ConclusionAnodal tDCS improved response initiation speed, but only in slower reacting individuals with PD. However, no differences attributable to tDCS were observed in clinical measures of bradykinesia or kinematic variables, suggesting that reaction time may represent a more sensitive measure of some components of bradykinesia.

No abstract

No abstract