Although sulfur mustard (SM) has been used as a chemical warfare agent since the early twentieth century, it has reemerged in the past decade as a major threat around the world. This agent injured over 100,000 Iranians and one-third is suffering from late effects until today. Mustard affects many organs such as the skin, eyes, and lungs, as well as the gastrointestinal, endocrine, and hematopoietic system. In this study we focused on review of the late Cutaneous and ocular complications caused by exposure to SM. All studies regarding long-term ocular and cutaneous effects, which have been done on Iranian population, were collected from domestic and international sources. Pruritus is the most common complain and a malignant change is the most important lesion, which has to be considered. Also this agent is causes of chronic and delayed destructive lesions in the ocular surface and cornea, leading to progressive visual deterioration and ocular irritation.

The pulsed corneal cross-linking protocol induced a significantly deeper stromal demarcation line when compared to the 4 minutes of highly accelerated continuous CXL protocol. Neither CXL protocol induced a shallower demarcation line comparable to less accelerated CXL protocols previously reported.

Background:Keratoconus is a bilateral non-inflammatory corneal disease. Collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a new treatment option for the disease that uses ultraviolet A light irradiation and riboflavin administration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of CXL on corneal topographic and refractive values in patients with keratoconus younger than 18 years of age.Materials and Methods:For the clinical trial study, 37 patients (64 eyes) younger than 18 years of age with progressive keratoconus were included. Age, sex, family history of keratoconus, and history of allergic disorders and eye rubbing were recorded. Refractive, topographic, and topometric indices were evaluated before and 12 months after the CXL with 3mW for 30 minutes.Results:Mean age (±SD) of the patients was 15.83 ± 1.53 years; 26 (70.3%) of the 37 patients were male. Fourteen (37.8%) had positive family history of keratoconus, 11 (29.7%) had history of allergic disorders, and 15 (40.5%) had positive history of eye rubbing. Of the refractive values, cylinder value decreased significantly from −4.50 ± 0.29 to −4.11 ± 0.28 (P = 0.001). Also, the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly 12 months after CXL (P = 0.012 and 0.001, respectively). Maximum keratometry before and after the operation was 53.82 ± 0.72 and 53.33 ± 0.72, respectively (P = 0.018). Differences for simulated K values, the thinnest cornea pachymetry, keratoconus index (KI), index of highest asymmetry (IHA), and index of highest decentration (IHD) before and 12 months after the CXL were statistically significant (P = 0.015, 0.034, <0.001, 0.017, 0.019, and 0.004, respectively).Conclusion:CXL improves the refractory, topographic, and topometric indices in patients with keratoconus younger than 18 years of age.

PurposeTo compare the performance of OKULIX ray-tracing software with SRK-T and Hoffer Q formula in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in patients presenting with cataract.MethodsIn this prospective study, 104 eyes of 104 patients with cataract who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were recruited. Three IOL brands were used and for all eyes, IOL power calculation was performed using SRK-T, Hoffer Q formula and also OKULIX ray-tracing software. For all patients, axial length and keratometry data was obtained with IOLMaster 500 device and IOL power was determined using Hoffer Q and SRK-T formula. The IOL powers were also calculated using the OKULIX ray-tracing software combined with CASIA AS-OCT and IOLMaster 500 device. Optically measured axial length of eyes were inserted to OKULIX software from IOLMaster 500 device, and anterior and posterior tomographic and corneal pachymetry data was imported from CASIA AS-OCT into the OKULIX.The performance of each calculation methods was measured by subtracting the predicted postoperative refraction from the postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE). For each of the 3 methods, the mean absolute prediction error was determined, too.ResultsThe mean value absolute prediction error by OKULIX, SRK-T and Hoffer Q formulas, respectively, were 0.42 (±0.03), 0.36 (±0.02) and 0.37 (±0.02). The mean absolute prediction error by OKULIX had no significant difference between three IOL groups (P = 0.96), and it was confirmed that there was no meaningful statistically difference in mean absolute prediction error between the OKULIX, SRK-T and Hoffer Q formula. (P = 0.25). Also in each group of implanted IOLs, all three formulas worked with the same accuracy. The prediction error using OKULIX were within ±0.50 diopter in 63.5% of eyes and within ±1.00 diopter in 94.2% of eyes.ConclusionOKULIX ray-tracing IOL power measurements provides reliable and satisfactory postoperative results, which are comparable to other 3rd generation formulas of SRK-T and Hoffer Q.

Topography-guided single-step transepithelial PRK is a safe and effective method for treating the irregular refractive errors in post-RK patients.