• Air-permeability, U-value and whole house heat loss data were statistically tested.• Building fabric thermal performance gap was widespread in low energy dwellings.• Airtightness gap was trivial in Passivhaus but significant in non-Passivhaus units.• Gap increased by 0.8 m 3 /h/m 2 for every 1 m 3 /h/m 2 decrease in design air permeability.• Building regulations should require in-situ tests to reduce fabric performance gap.
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:Building fabric Low energy dwellings Passivhaus Airtightness Heat loss Thermal transmittance Co-heating test ABSTRACT This paper presents new evidence from a nationwide cross-project meta-study investigating the magnitude and extent of the difference between designed and measured thermal performance of the building fabric of 188 low energy dwellings in the UK. The dataset was drawn from the UK Government's national Building Performance Evaluation programme, and comprises 50 Passivhaus (PH) and 138 non-Passivhaus (NPH) dwellings, covering different built forms and construction systems. The difference between designed and measured values of air permeability (AP), external wall/roof thermal transmittance (U-value) and whole house heat loss were statistically analysed, along with a review of thermal imaging data to explain any discrepancies. The results showed that fabric thermal performance gap was widespread especially in terms of AP, although the magnitude of underperformance was much less in PH dwellings. While measured AP had good correlation with measured space heating energy for PH dwellings, there was no relationship between the two for NPH dwellings. The regression analysis indicated that for every 1 m 3 /h/m 2 reduction in designed air permeability, the gap increased by 0.8 m 3 /h/m 2 @50 Pa. Monte Carlo analysis showed that likelihood of AP gap was 78% in NPH dwellings designed to 5 m 3 /h/m 2 @50 Pa or lower. The study provides useful evidence for improving the fabric thermal performance of new housing through in-situ testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.