The problem in this study is the low ability of junior sepak takraw smash. This study aims to determine the Effect of Command Training Methods, Exploration and Motivation Training Methods on the Smash Ability Results of Junior Sepak Takraw Athletes in Sijunjung Regency. This study was conducted using a 2 x 2 factorial redesign. The method of exercise and motivation is as a factor variable, while the smash ability of the variable is bound. The population is all junior sepak takraw athletes assisted by PSTI sijunjung district. The sample was Sijunjung Regency Junior Sepak Takraw Athletes with 24 people with male and female genders. The sample collection method used in this study is the total sampling technique. The collection of smash capability data is carried out by testing the ability of smash, namely by smashing 20 times the predetermined target. The physical fitness data obtained were further analyzed with inferential statistics of two-way ANOVA 2 x 2 (two way ANOVA). Based on the results of data analysis and interpretation of the results of the study, it shows that: (1) there are differences in the ability of smash sepak takraw in the command training method to be higher than the exploration training method, (2) there is a difference in the ability of smash sepak takraw on high training motivation has differences with low training motivation, (3) there is an influence of interaction between training methods and motivation on the ability of smash sepak takraw, (4) there are differences in the ability to smash sepak takraw athletes who have high motivation, higher in command training methods than in exploration training methods, (5) there are differences in the smash ability of sepak takraw athletes who have low motivation, have differences with command training methods and exploration training methods

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models and nutritional status on the physical fitness of grade VII students of SMPN 21 Padang. This research model is a pseudo-experiment designed by Factorial by Level 2x2. The population of this study amounted to 119 people and a sample of 60 people with the Purposive Random Sampling technique. Collection of Nutritional Status data by tests using Body Mass Index (BMI) and Physical Fitness using the Indonesian Physical Fitness Test (TKJI) Age 13-15 years. Data were analyzed using two-path ANAVA at significance level α=0.05. Furthermore, because no interaction was found between the learning model and physical fitness, the Tukey Test was not carried out. The results of the data analysis showed: (1) Overall there was no difference in the learning outcomes of the PjBL learning model with the Case Method learning model, (2) There was no interaction between the learning model and nutritional status on physical fitness, (3) Physical fitness of students treatment of PjBL learning model is better than Case Method learning model in high nutritional status group, (4) Physical fitness of students treatment of PjBL learning model is better than Case Method learning model in low motor group.