Methane (CH4) flux from soil to the atmosphere is the result of two microbial processes, methanogenesis and CH4 oxidation. Land use may have a profound impact on the relative activities of these groups of organisms. In this study, the CH4 production and consumption potentials of soils from agricultural and nonagricultural ecosystems were assessed in laboratory incubations. Methane production potentials of most soils were low and in the range of 0.02 to 0.35 nmol CH4 g soil(-1) h(-1); however, soils from two of the agricultural sites that experience periodic water saturation had CH4 production potentials from 100 to 300 nmol CH4 g soil(-1) h(-1). The high methanogenic potential suggests that CH4 consumers may not be wholly dependent on atmospheric CH4 for their survival and maintenance. The prairie soils exhibited the highest CH4 oxidation under ambient atmospheric CH4 concentrations, and CH4 oxidation activity was markedly enhanced in incubations with an atmosphere enriched in CH4. This stimulated CH4 oxidation activity was generally greater in the agricultural soils as compared with the forest and prairie soils. Methane oxidation appeared to be related to soil nitrogen status. Under ambient atmospheric CH4 concentrations, CH4 oxidation was negatively related to soil mineral N (NO2- + NO3- + NH4+) concentration. However, a positive relationship between soil mineral N status and CH4 oxidation activity was observed in incubations with atmospheres enriched in CH4. This pattern suggests that the agricultural lands contain different populations of CH4 oxidizers than the natural systems.
The interactive effects of soil texture and type of N fertility (i.e., manure vs. commercial N fertilizer) on N2O and CH4 emissions have not been well established. This study was conducted to assess the impact of soil type and N fertility on greenhouse gas fluxes (N2O, CH4, and CO2) from the soil surface. The soils used were a sandy loam (789 g kg−1 sand and 138 g kg−1 clay) and a clay soil (216 g kg−1 sand, and 415 g kg−1 clay). Chamber experiments were conducted using plastic buckets as the experimental units. The treatments applied to each soil type were: (i) control (no added N), (ii) urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN), and (iii) liquid swine manure slurry. Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured over 8 weeks. Within the UAN and swine manure treatments both N2O and CH4 emissions were greater in the sandy loam than in the clay soil. In the sandy loam soil N2O emissions were significantly different among all N treatments, but in the clay soil only the manure treatment had significantly higher N2O emissions. It is thought that the major differences between the two soils controlling both N2O and CH4 emissions were cation exchange capacity (CEC) and percent water‐filled pore space (%WFPS). We speculate that the higher CEC in the clay soil reduced N availability through increased adsorption of NH4+ compared to the sandy loam soil. In addition the higher average %WFPS in the sandy loam may have favored higher denitrification and CH4 production than in the clay soil.
The precise effects of natural and disturbed terrestrial systems on the atmospheric CH4 pool are uncertain. This study was conducted to quantify and compare CH4 fluxes from a variety of ecosystems in central Iowa. We investigated agricultural systems under different management practices, a hardwood forest site, native and restored prairies, and a municipal landfill. Flux measurements were obtained using a closed-chamber method, and measurements were compiled by sampling over the 1993 and 1994 growing seasons. In 1993, most of the agricultural sites were net CH4 producers with cumulative CH4 fluxes ranging from -0.02 to 3.19 g m(-2) over the 258-d sampling season, while the natural ecosystems were net CH4 consumers, with cumulative seasonal fluxes ranging from -0.27 to -0.07 g m-2 258 d(-1). In 1994, only the landfill and the agricultural site treated with broadcast liquid swine manure (LSM) were net CH4 producers, while the remainder of the natural and agricultural ecosystems were net CH4 consumers, with mean seasonal flux rates ranging from -0.43 to -0.008 g m(-2) 271 d(-1). We hypothesize that the differences in CH4 fluxes between the two years are due to differences in rainfall. To illustrate the integration between land use and CH4 flux, we computed an area-weighted soil CH4 flux for the state of Iowa. Our calculations yielded a net average soil CH4 flux of 139,000 Mg CH4 for 1993 and 1994.
The U.S. livestock industry has evolved to confine a large number of animals on a few farms in concentrated areas in many states. The trend to fewer, larger operations coupled with highly intensive production methods has resulted in more concentration of manure nutrients within relatively small geographic areas. Researchers in these areas have reported that manure production is contributing more phosphorus (P) than available cropland can assimilate. Overapplication of manure nutrients combined with low P removal rates by many crops is frequently cited as a reason for the accumulation of excess soil P. We propose that higher amounts of soil P can be removed from soil using vegetative management. Soil P concentration can be reduced in fields with excess levels by using P-hyperaccumulator plants or growing plants that have been modified to increase their P-uptake characteristics through traditional breeding and transgenic techniques. In this context, we identify plant properties (root architecture, secretion of organic acids, etc.) that may be improved using these two techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.