SignificanceMeandering tidal channel networks play a central role in the ecomorphodynamic evolution of the landscapes they cut through. Despite their ubiquitous presence and relevance to sedimentary and landscape features, few observations of tidal-meander evolution exist, and we lack a full understanding of the governing processes. Field analyses show that tidal meanders, traditionally viewed as stable landscape features, display modes of migration and migration rates per unit width quite similar to those characterizing their fluvial counterparts, with important implications for the characterization of the related sedimentary products. The results presented here contribute to our understanding of the morphological evolution of tidal landscapes.

No abstract

Meandering channels extensively dissect fluvial and tidal landscapes, critically controlling their morphodynamic evolution and sedimentary architecture. In spite of an apparently striking dissimilarity of the governing processes, planform dimensions of tidal and fluvial meanders consistently scale to local channel width, and previous studies were unable to identify quantitative planimetric differences between these landforms. Here we use satellite imagery, measurements of meandering patterns, and different statistical analyses applied to about 10,000 tidal and fluvial meanders worldwide to objectively disclose fingerprints of the different physical processes they are shaped by. We find that fluvial and tidal meanders can be distinguished on the exclusive basis of their remotely-sensed planforms. Moreover, we show that tidal meanders are less morphologically complex and display more spatially homogeneous characteristics compared to fluvial meanders. Based on existing theoretical, numerical, and field studies, we suggest that our empirical observations can be explained by the more regular processes carving tidal meanders, as well as by the higher lithological homogeneity of the substrates they typically cut through. Allowing one to effectively infer processes from landforms, a fundamental inverse problem in geomorphology, our results have relevant implications for the conservation and restoration of tidal environments, as well as from planetary exploration perspectives.

The widespread distribution of tidal creeks and channels that undertake meandering behaviour in modern coasts contrasts with their limited documentation in the fossil record, where point‐bar elements arising from the interaction between a mix of both fluvial and tidal currents are mainly documented. The sedimentary products of tidal channel‐bend evolution are relatively poorly known, and few studies have focused previously on specific facies models for tidal point bars present in modern settings. This study improves understanding of tidal channel meander bends through a multi‐disciplinary approach that combines analyses of historical aerial photographs, measurements of in‐channel flow velocity, high‐resolution facies analyses of sedimentary cores and three‐dimensional architectural modelling. The studied channel bend (12 to 15 m wide and 2 to 3 m deep) drains a salt marsh area located in the north‐eastern sector of the microtidal Venice Lagoon, Italy. Historical photographs show that, during the past 77 years, the bend has translated seaward ca 15 m. Results show that the channel bend formed on a non‐vegetated mud flat that was progressively colonized by vegetation. Seaward translation occurred under aggradational conditions, with an overall migration rate of 0·2 to 0·3 m year−1, and was promoted by the occurrence of cohesive, poorly erodible outer bank deposits. Ebb currents are dominant, and translation of the channel bend promotes erosion and deposition along the landward and seaward side of the bar, respectively. Tidal currents show a clear asymmetry in terms of velocity distribution, and their offset pattern provides a peculiar grain‐size distribution within the bar. During the flood stage, sand sedimentation occurs in the upper part of the bar, where the maximum flow velocity occurs. During the ebb stage, the bar experiences the secondary helical flow that accumulates sand at the toe of the bar. Lateral stacking of flood and ebb deposits has caused the formation of localized coarsening‐upward and fining‐upward sedimentary packages, respectively.

No abstract