Purpose This paper details a usability testing case study on a simplified homepage for [Library]. The usability testing was completed in Spring 2017 to meet the needs of diverse user groups and shifting trends in Web design and development. At the conclusion of the usability testing, recommendations for change informed the design decisions and a new homepage was implemented in October 2018. Design/methodology/approach The researcher performed eight usability tests with a combination of the different library user types; full-time faculty, students, an administrator and members of the public. The usability test consisted of 13 specific tasks. After testers completed the tasks, users filled out a 30-question Likert-scale questionnaire and answered a set of 8 open-ended questions. Findings This paper discusses the recommendations for change which the researcher discovered at the conclusion of the usability testing period. The research found the need to improve and include specific navigational, visual and easy-to-use elements to best meet the needs of the users in the usability tests. Changes were ranked and implemented on a scale of catastrophic to cosmetic. Research limitations/implications As websites, technology and user preferences continually evolve, the homepage will need to be tested for usability again in the next several years. Researchers are encouraged to adapt the methods to their own institutions. Practical implications This paper discusses findings specific to [Library], which in turn has proved to increase usage of certain features and functions by the user community. Originality/value This is the first time usability testing has been done for the [Library’s] website. It was the first time the design of the homepage was informed by real user preference. This paper is valuable to those looking to create a simple, easy-to-use homepage that best benefits their own unique community of users.

No abstract

significant increases in textured and smooth groups when compared to no implant. In the biomimetic platform, SUPM2 had a higher rate of proliferation when compared to collagen only, which was not significant between groups. TLBR2 exposed to low serum media appeared to have a higher rate of cell proliferation in groups exposed to no implant (p>0.05). In full serum media, all cell lines demonstrated increased proliferation over time with no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION:When cultured in a 3D breast biomimetic platform, BIA-ALCL cells proliferate within a simulated breast microenvironment even without the addition of growth factors, while limited or decreased proliferation is seen when cultured in the same ECM without such cellular components. We have shown a difference in the cell proliferation trends that occur when different ALCL lines are cultured in 2-dimensions (media only) versus 3-dimensions (collagen embedded), emphasizing the physiologic relevance of our 3-dimensional model.

No abstract