The existence of the Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Agency (known as Perusahaan Penempatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia) is regulated in Law Number 8 of 2017 regarding the protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers. In some cases, many Indonesian Migrant Workers still work abroad non-procedurally or illegally. This study needed to be conducted to investigate the factors that cause many Prospective Indonesian Migrant Workers not willing to join Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Agency. Therefore, this study is expected to provide scientific benefits for readers and can be used as the material of thought by policymakers. This juridical-empirical research used the interview technique to collect the data as materials to obtain the answers to the research problems. The samples of this study were The Class I Immigration Checkpoint Bengkulu Office, known as Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I TPI Bengkulu, Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Agency, and Prospective Indonesian Migrant Workers. Some questions were asked directly to the informants to get the descriptions of the existence of Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Agencies in the consignment process of the Indonesian Migrant Workers. The existence of Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Agencies in the consignment process of Indonesian Migrant Workers based on Law Number 18 of 2017 has not been actualized optimally due to some problems. The problems included many Indonesian Migrant Workers who worked abroad non-procedurally or illegally, the regulation still needed to be evaluated, and lack of socialization related to the recruitment process of Indonesian Migrant Workers.

The researcher will discuss the Sub-Districts Head authority in evaluating Draft Regulation of the Village regarding Village Budget (APBDes) in Central Bengkulu Regency based on the Regent’s Regulation of Central Bengkulu Number 34 of 2018 regarding the Authority Delegation of the Regent to the Sub-District Head in evaluating Draft Regulation of the Village regarding Village Budget and Draft Regulation of the Village about Village Budget Amendment (p-APBDes). The purpose of this research was to find out and to analyze the authority of the Sub-District Head in terms of evaluating the Draft Regulation of the Village regarding APBDes in Central Bengkulu Regency based on the Regent’s Regulation of Central Bengkulu Number 34 of 2018 regarding the Authority Delegation of the Regent to the SubDistrict Head in evaluating Draft Regulation of the Village Regarding APBDes and Draft Regulation of the Village about p-APBDes. This research was normative legal research. Data sources used were primary and secondary data sources. In collecting the data, the researcher used the methods of library studies and field studies. After the research was conducted, it canbe concluded that the authority of the Sub-District Head in evaluating the Draft Regulation of the Village regarding APBDes and P-APBDes in Central Bengkulu Regency was carried out based on the regulation mandate that stipulated in Law No. 6 of 2014 about Village, Law No. 23 of 2014 about Local Government, Government Regulations No. 43 of 2014 about Regulations for Implementing Village Laws, Government Regulations No. 17 of 2018 about sub-districts, Regulation of Minister of Home Affairs No. 20 of 2018 about Village FinancialManagement and Regent’s Regulation of Central Bengkulu number 34 of 2018 regarding the Authority Delegation of the Regent to the Sub-District Head in evaluating Draft Regulation of the Village Regarding APBDes and Draft Regulation of the Village about p-APBDes.

The State and the Government are obliged and responsible for the orderliness of children adoption practices, both in terms of administration and legal certainty. Therefore several policies were issued through legislation and jurisprudence that regulates and handles the issue of children adoption. The implementation of children adoption must be based on Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 54 of 2007 concerning Children Adoption. This study aims to get an overview and explanation of the Implementation of Licensing for ChildrenAdoption in Bengkulu Province Based on Government Regulation 54 of 2007 concerning the Implementation of Children Adoption. The children adoption process requires regulations that are in accordance with the Laws and Government Regulations and needs control of how they are implemented in the field. In addition to the Social Department of Bengkulu Province as the technical executor of adoption activities, it is necessary to establish a Regional Consultation Team for Children Adoption (known as PIPA in Indonesian abbreviation), to avoid irregularities in the process of implementation of children adoption, such as the adoption of children carried out without proper procedures, falsification of data and the existence of child trafficking, so the goal of adopting a child for the best interests of the child is not achieved. In analyzing the data in this thesis, the researcher applied a qualitative juridical analysis approach that describes the picture of the data obtained by researcher in the field and connects with each other to get a general conclusion. From the results of the qualitative juridical analysis, it can be seen and obtained inductive conclusions, namely the way of thinking in taking conclusions in general was based on facts that are specific. Data collection methods in this study were done through in-depth interview techniques, observation and documentation.The informants in this study were determined by selecting informants who comprehended and were directly involved in the implementation of child adoption programs. The informants consisted of the Head of Social Rehabilitation Division at the Social Department of Bengkulu Province, Head of Children and Elderly Social Rehabilitation Section at the Social Department of Bengkulu Province, Head of ChildrenProtection Section of the Women Empowerment Department and Children Protection in Bengkulu Province, Children Social Workers and Parents or Prospective Adoptive Parents who follow procedural for children adoption in accordance with applicable regulations. Data processing and analysis were conducted through data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing.

Evaluation is the study and the assessment on the local regulation draft regulated in accordance with the law in the field of local government and other statutory regulations to find out if there are things that are contrary to the public interest, and/or higher legislation and/or decency. The evaluation on the local regulation draft in the regency/city area regarding local taxes and Local Retribution by the governor as a representative of the central government is a form of authority de-concentration delegated by the central government to the governor. The evaluation process is carried out before the relevant legal norms are binding on the general public. The central government gradually evaluates, tests, and even rejects the local regulation draft. Regarding the implementation of the evaluation, in practice it still creates complexities of obstacles in the evaluation of local regulation draft which actually has an impact on legal certainty, especially the legal interests of the district/city government. The problems of this research were how to evaluate the implementation of the Local Regulation Draft concerning Local Taxes and Local Retribution by the Governor and the obstacles in the implementation of the evaluation of the Local Regulation Draft concerning Local Taxes and Local Retribution by the Governor. The approach method used in this research was the normative legal method (juridical normative), while the analysis used was qualitative analysis. The data sources used were primary legal materials obtained through laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials sourced from various official documents. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the evaluation of the local regulation draft in the regency/city area regarding local taxes and local retribution by the Governor seen from the role and authority of the institution has been in accordance with the legislation, but when viewed from the side of the procedures and time regulated in its implementation it has not been effective and does it not provide legal certainty. Obstacles in evaluating the local regulation draft in the regency/city area are the ineffectiveness of tiered supervision and the inaccuracy of time as stipulated in the legislation.

The Indonesian government in dealing with the COVID-19 has created various legal instruments for policy implementation. One of those instruments is the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2020 which regulates the financial policy for COVID-19 which has been passed as Law Number 2 of 2020. However, there is a provision that is contrary to the administrative law principles, precisely in Article 27 paragraph (3). The norm is considered to close the gap of public access to take legal remedies to correct or examine decisions that have potential to cause harm related to actions or decisions. Even though Article 49 of Law Number 5 of 1986 also provides the similar meaning, however because the COVID-19 pandemic is categorized as a non-natural disaster, the COVID-19 Financial Policy Law should provide an expansion of state administrative court's (PTUN) absolute competence in examine and adjudicate administrative dispute cases. Therefore, this study tries to parse how the Regulations and Options for Public Legal Remedies towards Government Actions and Decisions in Non-Natural Disaster Emergencies in Indonesia. Second, what is the idea for expanding the absolute competence of PTUN in non-natural disaster emergencies in Indonesia. This research uses normative legal research methods with descriptive research specifications and analyzed through literature study and data analysis methods using juridical-qualitative. The result shows that it is time for redesigning in order to fulfill the community legal means in dealing with non-natural disaster conditions of COVID-19. The design can be rearrange the provisions in the COVID-19 Financial Policy Law and the Law of PTUN, so that the capability of PTUN in the future is not limited to state administrative decisions, including all the actions of state administrative bodies / Officials based on public law that cause harm for a person or civil legal entity either in normal conditions or in conditions of non-natural disasters