Law No. 6/2014 on Villages provides for sustainable community empowerment at the village level through the development of ancient sites, and local wisdoms through the tourism village concept in Indonesia. Because a vast majority of its population depends on agriculture and tourism for sustenance, the regional government of the Bengkulu Province is making reforms to improve its large tourism sector consisting of numerous pristine ancient sites, culture and local wisdom. However, this sector, so vital to the region and beyond, has not been very productive for both the local government and more importantly the population of Bengkulu. Attempting the address the question as to how to design an ideal tourism boosting policy and regulations to improve the economy of Bengkulu Province, this research aims to identify and analyze the dynamics of village-related regulations dealing with the management of tourist attractions, including tourism village concept in Bengkulu Province. In so doing the study also seeks to analyze the arrangement and management of village wealth so that it can be developed into a tourist attraction based on local wisdom in the context of economic development that favors both the community and the local government in Bengkulu Province. This study reveals that the shortcoming in the management of touristic resources in the Bengkulu Province lies in several issues including the lack of regional policies and regulations that prioritize community participation, poor organization and management of the program, bad governance and the control of the program by thugs, hence eroding the possibility for accountability.

Evaluation is the study and the assessment on the local regulation draft regulated in accordance with the law in the field of local government and other statutory regulations to find out if there are things that are contrary to the public interest, and/or higher legislation and/or decency. The evaluation on the local regulation draft in the regency/city area regarding local taxes and Local Retribution by the governor as a representative of the central government is a form of authority de-concentration delegated by the central government to the governor. The evaluation process is carried out before the relevant legal norms are binding on the general public. The central government gradually evaluates, tests, and even rejects the local regulation draft. Regarding the implementation of the evaluation, in practice it still creates complexities of obstacles in the evaluation of local regulation draft which actually has an impact on legal certainty, especially the legal interests of the district/city government. The problems of this research were how to evaluate the implementation of the Local Regulation Draft concerning Local Taxes and Local Retribution by the Governor and the obstacles in the implementation of the evaluation of the Local Regulation Draft concerning Local Taxes and Local Retribution by the Governor. The approach method used in this research was the normative legal method (juridical normative), while the analysis used was qualitative analysis. The data sources used were primary legal materials obtained through laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials sourced from various official documents. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the evaluation of the local regulation draft in the regency/city area regarding local taxes and local retribution by the Governor seen from the role and authority of the institution has been in accordance with the legislation, but when viewed from the side of the procedures and time regulated in its implementation it has not been effective and does it not provide legal certainty. Obstacles in evaluating the local regulation draft in the regency/city area are the ineffectiveness of tiered supervision and the inaccuracy of time as stipulated in the legislation.

The purpose of this research is to study about Benchmark Determination of the Administrative Court Decision Execution Forced In. Research methods used in this thesis is a research type normative and descriptive analytical research specifications, and approaches used, namely, the approach Law and approach cases. From the research we concluded that since when the claimant may apply for money of enforced at the time of the initial filing a lawsuit to the Administrative Court, for their money forced / Dwangsom in a decision of the State Administrative Court, it is motivated by a petition of Plaintiff in the lawsuit to beg loading money forced / Dwangsom Defendant if lost and wayward implement administrative court ruling, benchmark application is the amount of money forced the ruling stating Plaintiff granted, judgment and decision condemnatoir who has obtained permanent legal force. Because implementing administrative court ruling is always Agency / Administrative Officers are still active, more effective and efficient if the imposition of forced currency / dwangsom taken / deducted from salaries / allowances officials concerned each month. So it is not charged to the State finances forced money order imposing sanctions / dwangsom and administratively feasible, must be followed by concrete implementing regulations relating to money forced / dwangsom to sync with the Administrative Court Act and the Law on Government Administration.

The arrangement of the Attorney institution of the Republic of Indonesia in the 1945 Constitution is less clear and less detailed about its position as well as its authority in law enforcement. Departing from the description of the weakness of the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia’s position above, it is necessary to place the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia proportionally in order to be autonomous and independent in the perspective of the rule of law theory and the power sharing theory. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the position of Attorney in the 1945 Constitution which was attached in the executive domain had caused a lot of debate. The debate was focused on whether it was a right choice to practically put the Attorney as a law enforcement institution in Executive domain where it should had been legally put in judiciary domain. Furthermore, strengthening the position of Attorney in the 1945 Constitution can be done though the fifth amendment of the 1945 Constitution, therefore the adjustment of the Attorney position must be explicitly stated in the institutions within the environment of judicial power accompanied by its authority.

Along with the formation of institutions in Indonesia, it is known by the term Non-Departmental Government Institutions (LNDP) which after the enactment of the Law on State Ministries which changed department term into ministry, but at the initiative of several ministries, there were also other terms that were introduced, namely Non-Structural Institutions (LSN). One of the NonStructural Institutions (LSN) currently is State Civil Apparatus Commission. In Article 1 number 19 of Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus is stated that the Commission of ASN, which abbreviated as KASN, is a non-structural institution which independent and free from political intervention to create ASN employee that professional and performs to provide services fairly and neutral and become adhesive and unifier of the nation. KASN was formed to supervisethe implementation of basic norms of the ethic code and behavior code of ASN as well as the Application of the Merit System in ASN’s policy and management.