No abstract

ObjectiveIn the USA, the increase in state-sanctioned medical and recreational cannabis consumption means more young adults (YA) with cancer are using cannabis. Data and information are needed to characterise this use and frame much needed discussions about the role of cannabis in cancer care. To that end, this study’s objective was to describe consumption of cannabis in YA with cancer.MethodsFour hundred seventy-six patients with cancer ages 18–39 years at a large comprehensive cancer centre responded to a survey about their cannabis consumption. The survey was administered online between July 2019 and June 2020, and respondents were anonymous.ResultsFifty-two per cent (n=247) of respondents endorsed use within the last year; of these, half reported using cannabis prior to their diagnosis. Consumption was about equally distributed between smoking/inhalation and eating/drinking cannabis products. Seventy-five per cent of consumers used cannabis at least weekly. Top five primary reasons for use were pain, anxiety, nausea, sleep and recreation. More frequent consumption was associated with greater perceived improvement in certain symptoms. Cannabis products tended to be sourced from friends and family and information from non-medical sources. Most YA reported being comfortable discussing their consumption with providers.ConclusionsMany YA are using cannabis frequently to manage their cancer-related and treatment-related symptoms. Findings support the need for providers to consider cannabis use in treatment planning and symptom management with YA. Findings should help frame patient and provider discussions and herald much needed research on the effect of cannabis consumption on patient outcomes.

Objective: The purpose of this qualitative study was to compare the lived experiences among extended (one year or less post-treatment) and long-term (three years or more post-treatment) young adult (YA) cancer survivors (ages 18–39 years old). Methods: Two trained researchers conducted semi-structured interviews inquiring about the overall lived experience of N = 24 YA cancer survivors (n = 12 extended and n = 12 long-term). The same two researchers independently completed line-by-line coding and thematic content analysis. Results: Interviews lasted an average of 41 min and revealed common themes of symptoms, psychosocial concerns, coping, and changes in health behaviors (e.g., nutrition and physical activity). All participants discussed symptoms impairing their quality of life and affecting their fear of recurrence. Specific psychosocial concerns among extended survivors were appearance-related (e.g., hair loss, weight gain) whereas concerns among long-term survivors included job loss, fertility, and financial stress. Coping strategies described by extended survivors were often distraction-based (e.g., watching television to “escape”), while long-term survivors described more active coping strategies (e.g., yoga, meditation, and seeking support from family and friends). Most survivors reflected on limited physical activity or unhealthy eating during treatment; however, nearly all declared healthy eating and physical activity post-treatment to improve well-being. Conclusions: YA cancer survivors report differing symptoms, psychosocial concerns, and coping strategies across time since treatment. While survivors reported challenges with physical activity and nutrition during treatment, nearly all emphasized the importance of these health behaviors post-treatment. Thus, health behavior interventions could represent a preferred approach to address post-treatment challenges and improve quality of life for YA survivors.

Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology patients are less likely to enroll in clinical trials than pediatric patients. After two decades of effort to improve enrollments, challenges remain. We sought to explore where phase II and phase III trials are available for an AYA cohort. Methods: Based on the epidemiology of AYA cancers and outcomes, we assembled a simulated data set of 1000 patients (AYAsims). Available phase II and phase III trials were matched to diseases and treatment setting (relapsed or newly diagnosed) and characterized by sponsor (industry, National Clinical Trials Network [NCTN], investigator initiated) and location (Moffitt Cancer Center [MCC], community or pediatric). Results: The majority of AYAsims had potential first line (64.4%) and/or relapsed (68.1%) trials. The majority of these opportunities were industry-sponsored trials available at MCC. Phase II trials for relapsed cancer were most often at the MCC and more likely to be investigator-initiated trials. Trial availability for histologies varied widely, likely reflective of the overall epidemiology of cancers beyond the AYA age range. Pediatric hospitals offered trials for select cancers but had a trial portfolio that matched the fewest number of AYAsims. Conclusions: In general, newly diagnosed AYA patients have trial enrollment opportunities in both the community and comprehensive cancer center setting with select diagnoses having more trials in pediatric hospitals. Relapsed AYA patients have the most trial opportunities at a comprehensive cancer center. A facile system that navigates patients across health systems would maximize potential AYA trial enrollments.

No abstract