This work discusses how to derive upper bounds for the expected generalisation error of supervised learning algorithms by means of the chaining technique. By developing a general theoretical framework, we establish a duality between generalisation bounds based on the regularity of the loss function, and their chained counterparts, which can be obtained by lifting the regularity assumption from the loss onto its gradient. This allows us to re-derive the chaining mutual information bound from the literature, and to obtain novel chained information-theoretic generalisation bounds, based on the Wasserstein distance and other probability metrics. We show on some toy examples that the chained generalisation bound can be significantly tighter than its standard counterpart, particularly when the distribution of the hypotheses selected by the algorithm is very concentrated.

We study a ranking problem in the contextual multi-armed bandit setting. A learning agent selects an ordered list of items at each time step and observes stochastic outcomes for each position. In online recommendation systems, showing an ordered list of the most attractive items would not be the best choice since both position and item dependencies result in a complicated reward function. A very naive example is the lack of diversity when all the most attractive items are from the same category. We model position and item dependencies in the ordered list and design UCB and Thompson Sampling type algorithms for this problem. We prove that the regret bound over T rounds and L positions is Õ(L √ dT ), which has the same order as the previous works with respect to T and only increases linearly with L. Our work generalizes existing studies in several directions, including position dependencies where position discount is a particular case, and proposes a more general contextual bandit model.Preprint. Under review.