No abstract

Bryostatins and phorbol esters acutely activate and subsequently down-regulate protein kinase C (PKC) by inducing its proteolysis via an unknown pathway. Here we show that treatment of renal epithelial cells with bryostatin 1 (Bryo) produced novel PKC-alpha species, which were larger than the native protein (80 kDa). The >80 kDa PKC-alpha species contained Ubi as indicated by immunostaining and accumulated in the presence of lactacystin, a selective inhibitor of proteolysis by the proteasome. In vitro experiments with 125I-ubiquitin and membranes from Bryo-treated cells showed that PKC-alpha became ubiquitinated by a reaction that depended on ATP and a cytosolic fraction. Lactacystin or a peptidyl aldehyde, Bz-Gly-Leu-Ala-leucinal, which inhibits certain proteinase activities of the proteasome, inhibited Bryo-evoked disappearance of PKC-alpha protein from the cells. Lacta preserved Bryo-induced 32P-labeled PKC-alpha indicating that the proteasome inhibitor spared activated enzyme from down-regulation in vivo. These findings show that Bryo induces the degradation of PKC-alpha by the ubiquitin-proteasome complex.

The histidine permease of Salmonella typhimurium is an ABC transporter (traffic ATPase). The liganded soluble receptor, the histidine-binding protein HisJ, interacts with the membrane-bound complex HisQMP 2 and stimulates its ATPase activity, which results in histidine translocation. In this study, we utilized HisJ proteins with mutations in either of the two lobes and wild type HisJ liganded with different substrates to show that each lobe carries an interaction site and that both lobes are involved in inducing (stimulating) the ATPase activity. We suggest that the spatial relationship between the lobes is one of the factors recognized by the membranebound complex in dictating the efficiency of the induction signal and of translocation. Several of the key residues involved have been identified. In addition, using constitutive ATPase mutants, we show that the binding protein provides some additional essential function(s) in translocation that is independent of the stimulation of ATP hydrolysis, and one possible mechanism is proposed, which includes the notion that liganded HisJ has different optimal conformations for signaling and for translocation.

The periplasmic histidine-binding protein, HisJ, is a receptor for the histidine permease of Salmonella typhimurium. Receptors of this type are composed of two lobes that are far apart in the unliganded structure (open conformation) and drawn close together in the liganded structure (closed conformation). The binding of the ligand, in a cleft between the lobes, stabilizes the closed conformation. Such receptors have several functions in transport: interaction with the membrane-bound complex, transmission of a transmembrane signal to hydrolyze ATP, and receiving a signal to open the lobes and release the ligand. In this study the mechanism of action of HisJ was further investigated using mutant proteins defective in ligand binding activity and closed form-specific monoclonal antibodies (Wolf, A., Shaw, E. W., Nikaido, K., and Ames G. F.-L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23051-23058). Y14H is defective in stabilization of the closed form, does not assume the closed empty form, and assumes an altered closed liganded form. T121A and G119R are similar to Y14H, but assume a normal closed liganded form. S72P binds the ligand to the open form, but does not assume a recognizable closed form. S92F is defective in the ability to undergo conformational change and to stabilize the closed form. All other mutant proteins appear to fall within one of these four categories. The biochemical characterization of these mutant proteins agrees with the structural analysis of the protein. We suggest that mutant proteins that do not assume the normal closed form, in addition to their defect in ligand binding, fail to interact with the membrane-bound complex and/or to transmit transmembrane signals.

Cell wall growth of an asynchronous culture of Schizosaccharomyces pombe was studied by fluorescence microscopy and time‐lapse cinematography. The cell wall growth of individual cells is a time‐ordered process which can be divided into 4 stages: post‐division stage, stage of growth initiation, stage of extension growth, and constant length stage. Different aspects of these stages are discussed. During the exponential phase of growth the population has a rather stable structure from the point of view of division scar numbers. The significance of the division scars for the study of cell wall growth and multiplication is discussed.