No abstract

When creating digital artefacts, it is important to ensure that the product being made is accessible to as much of the population as is possible. Many guidelines and supporting tools exist to assist reaching this goal. However, little is known about developers' understanding of accessible practice and the methods that are used to implement this. We present findings from an accessibility design workshop that was carried out with a mixture of 197 developers and digital technology students. We discuss perceptions of accessibility, techniques that are used when designing accessible products, and what areas of accessibility development participants believed were important. We show that there are gaps in the knowledge needed to develop accessible products despite the effort to promote accessible design. Our participants are themselves aware of where these gaps are and have suggested a number of areas where tools, techniques and guidance would improve their practice. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in accessibility; User studies; Accessibility systems and tools; User centered design.

The ability of subjects to identify vowels in vibrotactile transformations of consonant-vowel syllables was measured for two types of displays: a spectral display (frequency by intensity), and a vocal tract area function display (vocal tract location by cross-sectional area). Both displays were presented to the fingertip via the tactile display of the Optacon transducer. In the first experiments the spectral display was effective for identifying vowels in /b/V/ context when as many as 24 or as few as eight spectral channels were presented to the skin. However, performance fell when the 12- and 8-channel displays were reduced in size to occupy 1/2 or 1/3 of the 24-row tactile matrix. The effect of reducing the size of the display was greater when the spectrum was represented as a solid histogram ("filled" patterns) than when it was represented as a simple spectral contour ("unfilled" patterns). Spatial masking within the filled pattern was postulated as the cause for this decline in performance. Another experiment measured the utility of the spectral display when the syllables were produced by multiple speakers. The resulting increase in response confusions was primarily attributable to variations in the tactile patterns caused by differences in vocal tract resonances among the speakers. The final experiment found an area function display to be inferior to the spectral display for identification of vowels. The results demonstrate that a two-dimensional spectral display is worthy of further development as a basic vibrotactile display for speech.

No abstract

No abstract