BackgroundAccidental falls, especially for the elderly, are a major health issue. Balance disorders are one of their main causes. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has proven to be useful in improving balance of elderly patients with instability. Its major handicap is probably its cost, which has prevented its generalisation. So, we have designed a clinical trial with posturographic VR, to assess the optimum number of sessions necessary for a substantial improvement and to compare computerised dynamic posturography (CDP) (visual feedback) and mobile posturography (vibrotactile feedback).MethodsDesign: randomized controlled trial. It is an experimental study, single-center, open, randomized (balanced blocks of patients) in four branches in parallel, in 220 elderly patients with high risk of falls; follow-up period: twelve months. Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary referral hospital. Participants: people over 65 years, fulfilling two or more of the following requirements: a) at least one fall in the last twelve months. b) take at least 16 s or require some support in perform the “timed up and go” test. c) a percentage of average balance in the sensory organization test (SOT) of the CDP < 68%. d) at least one fall in any of the conditions in SOT-CDP. e) a score in Vertiguard’s gSBDT > 60%. Intervention: Four differents protocols of vestibular rehabilitation (randomization of the patients). Main outcome measure: The percentage of average balance in the SOT-CDP. Secondary measures: time and supports in the “timed up and go” test, scores of the CDP and Vertiguard, and rate of falls.DiscussionPosturographic VR has been proven to be useful for improving balance and reducing the number of falls among the aged. However, its elevated cost has limited its use. It is possible to implement two strategies that improve the cost-benefit of posturography. The first involves optimising the number of rehabilitation sessions; the second is based on the use of cheaper posturography systems.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03034655. Registered on 25 January 2017.

No abstract

Postural control is achieved through the integration at the central nervous system level of information obtained by the visual, somatosensory and vestibular systems. Computerized dynamic posturography and the Sway Star system are both used to carry out sensory analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of sex and age on sensory analysis, measured with these two systems, and to compare their results. A prospective trial was conducted with 70 healthy individuals (average age: 44.9 years) uniformly distributed in seven age groups, who underwent postural study with both systems. We used SPSS 16.0 for statistical study: comparison of means test for influence of gender and age and Pearson's correlation test (p < 0.05). Gender variable had no influence. The influence of age in vestibular input was found to be significant with both posturography systems, while visual input was only found to be significant with the Sway Star. The results with the two systems were not comparable. Sensory contribution does not remain stable throughout life. Visual information decreases with age, reaching a minimum at 40-49 years, and may correspond to the deterioration of eyesight with age. Propioceptive information showed no statistically significant changes, and several forms of treatment might correct the deterioration of this system. Vestibular information reaches a maximum in the 40-49 years age group in an attempt to compensate for visual deterioration, and decreases again in subsequent decades. This may be due to aging of the vestibular system and the difficulty in its correction.

No abstract