It can be called that the dynamics of national and state life in Indonesia are increasingly being tested by the same problem. For example, an outbreak of judicial corruption from the time to time, which was never ending. Law enforcers who are echoed as honorable professions, but on the other hand, these are exacerbated by the corrupt behavior of those professions. The sale and purchase of a case is no longer viewed as taboo, indeed it just looks like proper. Which means, it is a kind of a sign that the various legal regulations that normatively regulate the entire judicial process are ultimately unable to overcome the judicial corruption. The main objective of this research focuses on analysis related to efforts to revitalize the legal system in order to create an ideal rule of law as stated by Lawrance Friedman in his book namely "The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective". In this research, the method used is normative juridical using statutory, conceptual and historical approaches. The results of the research present an idea which is divided into three according to the three elements in the formation of a rule of law according to Lawrance Friedman, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. With regard to legal substance, the author provides the idea of a judicial preview as a method of validating the constitutionality of laws. Then related to the legal structure, the author provides ideas related to efforts to build morality and professionalism of law enforcement officials. Meanwhile, in terms of legal culture, the author provides ideas related to efforts to build a legal culture in society that is aware of the law and the constitution.

Along with the times, the motives or concept of corruption are increasingly complex and growing, as well as the increasing number of transnational crimes, it makes the world need regulations regarding illicit enrichment in legal products at the level of law to allow the imposition of legal sanctions for these crimes, including Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the practice of illicit enrichment in Indonesia and its comparison with other countries, as well as an analysis of the urgency of regulating illicit enrichment in Indonesian law as one of the most important norms in efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. In this study, the method used is normative juridical using a statutory, conceptual and case approach. From the results of the study, an idea that is presented in efforts to develop and reform law in Indonesia, namely in the context of eradicating corruption. This idea is discussed in more depth through a number of concrete cases that have been processed in Indonesia which shows that if we have illicit enrichment norms, the handling of these cases will be maximized. Through this regulation related to illicit enrichment, of course, it can prevent public officials (corporations) from committing corruption, minimizing initiatives to do business or other activities that are full of conflicts of interest (with their positions).

The Covid-19 emergency condition requires a change in the priority of using village funds, which was originally to finance government administration, development implementation, community development, and community empowerment switch to village cash direct assistance activities. Mekarsari Village basically had several priorities before the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic, one of which was the improvement of infrastructure such as roads and government agencies such as village offices due to the earthquake that hit Lombok Island in mid-2018. The purpose of this study is to examine how the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Mekarsari Village is, then examine the authority of the Mekarsari Village Government in managing village funds in the Covid-19 pandemic era and how to optimize it, and examine what obstacles are faced by the Mekarsari Village Government in managing funds. village during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this study, the author applies the normative-empirical legal research method using a statutory, conceptual, and sociological approach. The results of the study indicate that the very broad function of the village government is the foundation for the sustainability of effective village government in carrying out local policies, especially in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic. Then the Mekarsari Village Government has also established a village fund program to support village development so that they are able to optimally manage human and natural resources in order to alleviate new poverty due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Social security program reflects state's responsibilities to provide social and economic protection to citizens. However, social security in Indonesia has remained to become a central issue after Presidential Regulation Number 14 of 2021. This regulation outlines administrative sanctions on delaying or terminating social security for citizens that refuse vaccines. This study examined the issue from philosophical, juridical, and sociological perspectives on the administrative sanctions for delaying or terminating the social security related to the vaccine requirements. This study used a legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. This study indicated that the regulation regarding the postponement or termination of social security provision contradicted Article 20(1) of Law Number 40 of 2004 on the National Social Security System. Also, it violated human rights about the right to social security based on the 1945 Constitution. Instead, to succeed in vaccination, it should adopt a socio-cultural approach by combining legal instruments with elements of local culture in the community for legitimating vaccination as its part of being accepted in the society. KEYWORDS: Social Security Program, Presidential Regulation, Administrative Sanctions, Vaccines, COVID-19.