The cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an extracellular organelle crucial for preserving its cellular integrity and detec ng environmental cues. The cell wall is composed of mannoproteins a ached to a polysaccharide network and is con nuously remodeled as cells undergo cell division, ma ng, gametogenesis or adapt to stressors. This makes yeast an excellent model to study the regula on of genes important for cell wall forma on and maintenance. Given that certain yeast strains are pathogenic, a be er understanding of their life cycle is of clinical relevance. This is why transcrip onal regulatory mechanisms governing genes involved in cell wall biogenesis or maintenance have been the focus of numerous studies. However, li le is known about the roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), a class of transcripts that are thought to possess li le or no protein coding poten al, in controlling the expression of cell wall-related genes. This review outlines currently known mechanisms of lncRNAmediated regula on of gene expression in S. cerevisiae and describes examples of lncRNA-regulated genes encoding cell wall proteins. We suggest that the associa on of currently annotated lncRNAs with the coding sequences and/or promoters of cell wall-related genes highlights a poten al role for lncRNAs as important regulators of the yeast cell wall structure.

Nuclear RNA exosome is the main 3'→5' RNA degradation and processing complex in eukaryotic cells and its dysregulation therefore impacts gene expression and viability. In this work we show that RNA exosome activity is necessary for maintaining cell wall stability in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. While the essential RNA exosome catalytic subunit Dis3 provides exoribonuclease catalytic activity, the second catalytic subunit Rrp6 has a non-catalytic role in this process. RNA exosome cofactors Rrp47 and Air1/2 are also involved. RNA exosome mutants undergo osmoremedial cell lysis at high temperature or at physiological temperature upon treatment with cell wall stressors. Finally, we show that a defect in protein glycosylation is a major reason for cell wall instability of RNA exosome mutants. Genes encoding enzymes that act in the early steps of the protein glycosylation pathway are downregulated at high temperature in cells lacking Rrp6 protein or Dis3 exoribonuclease activity and overexpression of the essential enzyme Psa1, that catalyzes synthesis of the mannosylation precursor, suppresses temperature sensitivity and aberrant morphology of these cells. Furthermore, this defect is connected to a temperature-dependent increase in accumulation of non-coding RNAs transcribed from loci encoding relevant glycosylation-related genes.

Stressful conditions such as high temperatures can compromise cellular integrity and cause bursting. In microorganisms surrounded by a cell wall, such as yeast, the cell wall is the primary shield that protects cells from environmental stress.

Pervasive transcription of eukaryotic genomes generates non-coding transcripts with regulatory potential. We examined the effects of non-coding antisense transcription on the regulation of expression of the yeast PHO5 gene, a paradigmatic case for gene regulation through promoter chromatin remodeling. A negative role for antisense transcription at the PHO5 gene locus was demonstrated by leveraging the level of overlapping antisense transcription through specific mutant backgrounds, expression from a strong promoter in cis, and use of the CRISPRi system. Furthermore, we showed that enhanced elongation of PHO5 antisense leads to a more repressive chromatin conformation at the PHO5 gene promoter, which is more slowly remodeled upon gene induction. The negative effect of antisense transcription on PHO5 gene transcription is mitigated upon inactivation of the histone deacetylase Rpd3, showing that PHO5 antisense RNA acts via histone deacetylation. This regulatory pathway leads to Rpd3-dependent decreased recruitment of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex to the PHO5 gene promoter upon induction of antisense transcription. Overall, the data in this work reveal an additional level in the complex regulatory mechanism of PHO5 gene expression by showing antisense transcription-mediated repression at the level of promoter chromatin structure remodeling.

Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent remodeling enzymes is crucial for all genomic processes, like transcription or replication. Eukaryotes harbor many remodeler types, and it is unclear why a given chromatin transition requires more or less stringently one or several remodelers. As a classical example, removal of budding yeast PHO8 and PHO84 promoter nucleosomes upon physiological gene induction by phosphate starvation essentially requires the SWI/SNF remodeling complex. This dependency on SWI/SNF may indicate specificity in remodeler recruitment, in recognition of nucleosomes as remodeling substrate or in remodeling outcome. By in vivo chromatin analyses of wild type and mutant yeast under various PHO regulon induction conditions, we found that overexpression of the remodeler-recruiting transactivator Pho4 allowed removal of PHO8 promoter nucleosomes without SWI/SNF. For PHO84 promoter nucleosome removal in the absence of SWI/SNF, an intranucleosomal Pho4 site, which likely altered the remodeling outcome via factor binding competition, was required in addition to such overexpression. Therefore, an essential remodeler requirement under physiological conditions need not reflect substrate specificity, but may reflect specific recruitment and/or remodeling outcomes.