Shugoshin (SGO) is a family of proteins that protect centromeric cohesin complexes from release during mitotic prophase and from degradation during meiosis I. Two mammalian SGO paralogues-SGO1 and SGO2-have been identified, but their distribution and function during mammalian meiosis have not been reported. Here, we analysed the expression of SGO2 during male mouse meiosis and mitosis. During meiosis I, SGO2 accumulates at centromeres during diplotene, and colocalizes differentially with the cohesin subunits RAD21 and REC8 at metaphase I centromeres. However, SGO2 and RAD21 change their relative distributions during telophase I when sisterkinetochore association is lost. During meiosis II, SGO2 shows a striking tension-dependent redistribution within centromeres throughout chromosome congression during prometaphase II, as it does during mitosis. We propose a model by which the redistribution of SGO2 would unmask cohesive centromere proteins, which would be then released or cleaved by separase, to trigger chromatid segregation to opposite poles.

We conclude that Drad21, as a member of a cohesin complex, is required in Drosophila cultured cells and embryos for proper mitotic progression. The protein is required in cultured cells for chromosome cohesion, spindle morphology, dynamics of a chromosome passenger protein, and stability of the cohesin complex, but apparently not for normal chromosome condensation. The observation of SA instability in the absence of Drad21 implies that the expression of cohesin subunits and assembly of the cohesin complex will be tightly regulated.

Centromere protein E (CENP-E) is a microtubule motor protein localised in the outer kinetochore plate and in the fibrous corona that relocalises to the midzone in early anaphase. While its expression in somatic cells has been widely analysed, an accurate description of its behaviour during the two meiotic divisions has not yet been reported. We have carefully analysed by immunofluorescence the subcellular distribution of CENP-E during mouse spermatogenesis. CENP-E first appears during late diakinesis/early prometaphase I as very bright C-shaped or "crescent" signals at each homologous centromere. These crescent CENP-E signals are also observed in unaligned prometaphase I bivalents that are not attached to spindle microtubules, while in bioriented metaphase I bivalents two kinds of fainter signals are observed. Thus, some bivalents present a plate-like signal while others show a pair of spots representing sister kinetochores at each homologous centromere. Double labelling of CENP-E with CENP-G and an anti-centromere serum indicates that in meiosis CENP-E is also located at the outer kinetochore plate and the fibrous corona. During early anaphase I CENP-E relocalises from kinetochores to the midzone where it is detected as fibrous strands, although some residual labelling persists at kinetochores until telophase I. During this stage CENP-E is detected as two parallel plates at the intercellular bridge. The general pattern of labelling during meiosis II is similar to that found during meiosis I. Our results suggest that CENP-E is implicated in the spindle checkpoint, and in chromosome alignment, during the two meiotic divisions in vertebrate males. We also demonstrate that the centromere changes its structure once alignment of all bivalents at the metaphase I plate has been reached.

The cohesin complexes play a key role in chromosome segregation during both mitosis and meiosis. They establish sister chromatid cohesion between duplicating DNA molecules during S-phase, but they also have an important role during postreplicative double-strand break repair in mitosis, as well as during recombination between homologous chromosomes in meiosis. An additional function in meiosis is related to the sister kinetochore cohesion, so they can be pulled by microtubules to the same pole at anaphase I. Data about the dynamics of cohesin subunits during meiosis are scarce; therefore, it is of great interest to characterize how the formation of the cohesin complexes is achieved in order to understand the roles of the different subunits within them. We have investigated the spatio-temporal distribution of three different cohesin subunits in prophase I grasshopper spermatocytes. We found that structural maintenance of chromosome protein 3 (SMC3) appears as early as preleptotene, and its localization resembles the location of the unsynapsed axial elements, whereas radiation-sensitive mutant 21 (RAD21) (sister chromatid cohesion protein 1, SCC1) and stromal antigen protein 1 (SA1) (sister chromatid cohesion protein 3, SCC3) are not visualized until zygotene, since they are located in the synapsed regions of the bivalents. During pachytene, the distribution of the three cohesin subunits is very similar and all appear along the trajectories of the lateral elements of the autosomal synaptonemal complexes. However, whereas SMC3 also appears over the single and unsynapsed X chromosome, RAD21 and SA1 do not. We conclude that the loading of SMC3 and the non-SMC subunits, RAD21 and SA1, occurs in different steps throughout prophase I grasshopper meiosis. These results strongly suggest the participation of SMC3 in the initial cohesin axis formation as early as preleptotene, thus contributing to sister chromatid cohesion, with a later association of both RAD21 and SA1 subunits at zygotene to reinforce and stabilize the bivalent structure. Therefore, we speculate that more than one cohesin complex participates in the sister chromatid cohesion at prophase I.