The topicality of the research is stipulated by the challenges the legal education faces due to the controversial trends toward globalization and national legal system preservation, toward comprehensive legal training on the one hand, and the market increasing demand for narrow-field practitioners. The aims of the research are to study law students' perceptions regarding teaching/learning formats of studies in progress, to follow the development of students' perceptions regarding their legal studies at different levels of higher education. The research methods included theoretical analysis, law students' survey, statistics data processing. The empirical studies included two surveys: the entry survey of second year students of LLB and the same students' survey when they have moved to the second year of their master studies. The research enhances the awareness of the specific characteristics of public international law teaching within national system of legal culture and its values. The empirical data contributes to teachers' understanding of students' needs and raises awareness of learner-centered education within legal domain. The article had both theoretical and practical value as the theoretical background and the proposed methodology can be applied to developing training courses for legal faculty.
The paper explores the new Russian Federation legislation and its implementation within the State response to the spread of the fake news during coronavirus infection (COVID-19). The rationale for the research incorporates international, regional, and national law doctrines on human rights for provision of true information and protection of disinformation. The research aims to consider Russian federal legislation response to the above issues within the spread of the COVID-19. The research materials include decisions, comments and clarifications of the Russian courts with regard to the topic under study. Particular cases are subject to analysis. The research methodology is based on a comprehensive comparative analysis of Russian legislation, its law enforcement practice during the COVD 19 pandemic. The methods of analysis and synthesis, interpretation of legislation, and case-analysis have been applied. The selection and investigation of cases rests on fieldbased approach, content analysis and coding techniques. The results of the study make it possible to highlight challenges and solutions to the goal of ensuring the rule of law and human rights for the true information within healthcare emergency settings. The data shows that Russian courts combine background legislation and latest regulations to consider cases within particular contexts, with regard to concrete, individuals, motives, needs, and deeds. Meanwhile, civil society provides a critical analysis of the situation and mentioned lack of balance between individual and collective rights assurance.
The purpose of the article is to explore the new Russian Federation legislation and its implementation within comprehensive measures of the State response to the spread of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). The rationale for the research incorporates international, regional, and national law doctrines on human rights. The research aims to consider Russian federal legislation response to the spread of the COVID-19 Pandemic from the angle of human rights provision within self-isolation and quarantine regimes. The research sets forth the hypothesis that the human rights provision in times of pandemics and health emergencies sharpens an acute nature of question on balance between individual and community rights protection during coronavirus worldwide spread. The above hypothesis determines a number of research tasks. They are supposed to specify the latest amendments to national legislation branches, explore its implementation with regard to various populations who stay in the country, and consider the individual and collective human rights protection and provision during self-isolation and quarantine regimes. The research materials include decisions, comments and clarifications of the Russian courts of various jurisdictions, with regard to the implementation of legislative changes and measures aimed at counteracting the spread of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in the Russian Federation, The research methodology is based on a comprehensive comparative analysis of Russian legislation, its law enforcement practice during the COVD 19 pandemic. The methods of analysis and synthesis, interpretation of legislation, and case-analysis have been applied. The selection and investigation of cases rests on fieldbased approach, content analysis and coding techniques. The results of the study make it possible to highlight challenges and solutions to the goal of ensuring the rule of law and human rights through the major legislative branches of the Russian Federation. The data shows that Russian courts combine background legislation and latest regulations to consider cases within particular contexts, with regard to concrete, individuals, motives, needs, and deeds. Meanwhile, civil society provides a critical analysis of the situation and mentioned lack of balance between individual and collective rights assurance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.