BackgroundWe compared the diagnostic accuracy between visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and modified cervicography as an alternative screening method for cervical precancerous lesions.MethodsA diagnostic cross-sectional study was performed at the outpatient clinic at an Indonesian national referral hospital from February until April 2015. We collected samples from patients who sequentially underwent VIA examination, modified cervicography, and colposcopy.ResultsA total of 185 patients were included in this study. Modified cervicography showed positive results in 7.6% of patients, while 7.0% of patients had a VIA positive result. This is compared to 5.4% of patients showing abnormal colposcopy results. From those results, we obtained that sensitivity and specificity of VIA were 96.0% and 90.9%. Meanwhile, sensitivity and specificity of modified cervicography were 97.7% and 90.9%, respectively, compared to colposcopy as a gold standard.ConclusionsModified cervicography and VIA are reliable tools for cervical cancer screening, with comparable sensitivity and specificity. Modified cervicography can be used as a supplementary tool to improve the documentation of VIA and as an alternative to VIA alone.

Introduction and importance Peritoneal Tuberculosis is one of extrapulmonary tuberculosis that occurs in 1-2% of patients, its incidence is higher in developing countries. It is very difficult to diagnosed and can mimic advanced ovarian cases. Making an accurate diagnosis is vital, laparoscopy is a great modality for this purpose. Case presentation A 36 years-old woman got referred with abdominal distention and weight loss from an internist and digestive surgeon. The abdominal computed tomography said thickening of the stomach wall with ascites. Ultrasound concluded the uterus, ovary, and endometrium within normal. The CA 125 levels elevated to 1200 U/mL and the complete blood count was normal. We were making diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and advanced ovarian cancer. We did the diagnostic laparoscopic and taking a biopsy sample, ascites with peritoneal carcinomatosis and omental cake were found, the peritoneal cavity was covered by miliary nodules. Histopathology results concluded peritoneal tuberculosis without malignancy signs. The patient was treated with tuberculosis drugs. The follow-up evaluations show significant clinical improvement. Clinical discussion When facing patients with massive ascites and elevated CA 125 without any ovary enlargement, a gynecologist should think that it may be a peritoneal TB case with peritoneal carcinomatosis and advance ovarian cancer possibility as differential diagnosis especially in developing countries. An exact diagnosis can be made using laparoscopy and histopathology examination. Conclusion Laparoscopy is the best modality to differentiate between peritoneal tuberculosis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and advance ovarian cancer. The benefits are direct visualization and could take a biopsy for histology examination.

AIM: The worrisome prognosis of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) needs a new perspective from developing countries. Thus, we attempted to study the 5-year overall survival (OS) of advanced-stage EOC patients who underwent debulking surgery in an Indonesian tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective study recruited forty-eight subjects between 2013 and 2015. We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses to predict risk factors leading to unwanted disease outcomes. The OS was evaluated through the Kaplan–Meier curve and Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression examined prognostic factors of patients. RESULTS: Prominent characteristics of our patients were middle age (mean: 51.9 ± 8.9 years), obese, with normal menarche onset, multiparous, not using contraception, premenopausal, with serous EOC, and FIGO stage IIIC. The subjects mainly underwent primary debulking surgery (66.8%), with 47.9% of all individuals acquiring optimal results, 77.1% of patients treated had the residual disease (RD), and 52.1% got adjuvant chemotherapy. The risk factor for serous EOC was menopause (odds ratio [OR] = 4.82). The predictors of suboptimal surgery were serous EOC (OR = 8.25) and FIGO stage IV (OR = 11.13). The different OS and median survival were observed exclusively in RD, making it an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 3.50). 5-year A five year OS and median survival for patients with advanced-stage EOC who underwent debulking surgery was 37.5% and 32 months, respectively. Optimal versus suboptimal debulking surgery yielded OS 43.5% versus 32% and median survival of 39 versus 29 months. Both optimal and suboptimal debulking surgery followed with chemotherapy demonstrated an OS 40% lower than those not administered (46.2% and 20%, respectively). The highest 5-year OS was in serous EOC (50%). Meanwhile, the most extended median survival was with mucinous EOC (45 months). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy following optimal and suboptimal debulking surgery has the best OS among approaches researched in this study. RD is a significant prognostic factor among advanced-stage EOC. Suboptimal surgery outcomes can be predicted by stage and histological subtype.