Background There is limited information regarding the effects of pediatric chronic pain management on the number and cost of chronic pain–related emergency department (ED) consultations. Aim This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the number and costs of chronic pain–related ED consultations of children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions at the Montreal Children’s Hospital (MCH). Methods Charts of patients followed by the Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain (CCP) of the MCH between April 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed. ED consultations, specialist consultations, medication prescriptions, hospital admissions, and outpatient consultation referrals were assessed for the period of 1 year before and after the patients’ first consultation with the CCP. Associated costs were also calculated. Results One-hundred sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-one percent consulted the ED and had 151 chronic pain–related ED consultations within 1 year before their initial CCP consultation. In the year following their first CCP consultation, 52 patients (31%) consulted the ED, of which 24 consultations were chronic pain–related (84% reduction). There was an 81% reduction in the costs associated with chronic pain–related ED consultations within 1 year after CCP management. In addition, there was a significant reduction in ED interventions within 1 year after CCP management, though there was no change in medication prescriptions, hospital admissions, or subspecialist consultations. Conclusion Children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions had fewer chronic pain–related ED consultations within 1 year after the first evaluation by an interdisciplinary center for complex pain, contributing to reduced ED costs.

Purpose: We sought to compare the costs of ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair (a-EVAR) and inpatient EVAR (i-EVAR) at up to 1-year of follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR between April 2016 and December 2018 at two academic centers. Patients planned for a-EVAR were compared with i-EVAR. Costs at 30 days and 1 year were extracted. These included operating room (OR) use, bed occupancy, laboratory and imaging, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reinterventions. Baseline characteristics were compared. Multiple regression model was used to identify predictors of increased EVAR costs. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare cost differences at 30 days and 1 year via an intention-to-treat analysis. Bonferroni post hoc test compared between-group differences. A p value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred seventy patients were included. Most underwent percutaneous EVAR (>94%) under spinal anesthesia (>84%). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair was successful in 84% (84/100). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair patients (76±8 years) were younger than i-EVAR (78±9 years). They also had a smaller mean aneurysm diameter (56±6 mm) compared with i-EVAR (59±6 mm). Emergency department visits, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar up to 1 year (all p=NS). Ambulatory endovascular aneurysm repair costs showed a non-statistically significant reduction in total costs at 30 days and 1 year by 27% and 21%, respectively. Patients younger than 85 years and males had a 30-day cost reduction by 34% (p=0.027) and 33% (p=0.035), respectively with a-EVAR. Conclusions: Same-day discharge is feasible and successful in selected patients. Patients younger than 85 years and males have a short-term cost benefit with EVAR done in the ambulatory setting without increased complications or reinterventions. Clinical Impact This study shows the overall safety of ambulatory EVAR with proper patient selection. These patient had similar post-intervention complications to inpatients. Same day discharge also resulted in short-term reduction in costs in male patients and patients younger than 85 years.

Objectives Procalcitonin testing is recommended to discriminate febrile young infants at risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI). However, this test is not available in many clinical settings, limited largely by cost. This study sought to evaluate contemporary real-world costs associated with the usual care of febrile young infants, and estimate impact on clinical trajectory and costs when incorporating procalcitonin testing. Methods We assessed hospital-level door-to-discharge costs of all well-appearing febrile infants aged ≤60 days, evaluated at a tertiary paediatric hospital between April/2016 and March/2019. Emergency Department and inpatient expense data for usual care were obtained from the institutional general ledger, validated by the provincial Ministry of Health. These costs were then incorporated into a probabilistic model of risk stratification for an equivalent simulated cohort, with the addition of procalcitonin. Results During the 3-year study period, 1168 index visits were included for analysis. Real-world median costs-per-infant were the following: $3266 (IQR $2468 to $4317, n=93) for hospitalized infants with SBIs; $2476 (IQR $1974 to $3236, n=530) for hospitalized infants without SBIs; $323 (IQR $286 to $393, n=538) for discharged infants without SBIs; and, $3879 (IQR $3263 to $5297, n=7) for discharged infants subsequently hospitalized for missed SBIs. Overall median cost-per-infant of usual care was $1555 (IQR $1244 to $2025), compared to a modelled cost of $1389 (IQR $1118 to $1797) with the addition of procalcitonin (10.7% overall cost savings; $1,816,733 versus $1,622,483). Under pessimistic and optimistic model assumptions, savings were 5.9% and 14.9%, respectively. Conclusions Usual care of febrile young infants is variable and resource intensive. Increased access to procalcitonin testing could improve risk stratification at lower overall costs.

Primary Subject area Emergency Medicine - Paediatric Background Fever in the first months of life is among the most common clinical problems in pediatric healthcare. Nearly 2% of all infants will be evaluated for fever in an Emergency Department (ED) and approximately 10% harbor life-threatening serious bacterial infections (SBIs). The Rochester criteria are most widely used criteria for risk-stratification and predate modern biomarkers including procalcitonin (PCT). Recently, a high-performing prediction rule incorporating PCT was derived by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). At present, PCT is not available in all clinical settings, limited largely by test cost. Objectives Compare the medical costs associated with PECARN and Rochester risk-stratification strategies using contemporary price, epidemiologic and test characteristic data. Design/Methods We assessed hospital-level costs associated with the door-to-discharge care of all well-appearing febrile infants aged ≤ 60 days evaluated at an urban tertiary pediatric hospital between April 2016 and March 2019. Direct and indirect ED and inpatient costs were obtained from provincial Ministry of Health data. Real-world costs were then incorporated into a probabilistic model for a cohort of equal size using either Rochester or PECARN risk-stratification, accounting for the added incremental cost of PCT ($24.86CAD). Models used an 8.4% pooled SBI risk, and Sn/Sp for Rochester and PECARN of 94%/49% and 98%/63%, respectively. Modeling was calculated under 4 scenarios; true positive with hospitalization, false negative with return visit and hospitalization, false positive with hospitalization, true negative with ED discharge. All costs were calculated in Canadian dollars. Results During the 3-year study period, 1168 index infant encounters met inclusion and were analyzed for hospital trajectory costs. Median costs per infant were $323 (IQR $286-$393) for infants discharged from the ED with no SBI, $2356 (IQR $1858-$3120) for infants hospitalized with no SBI, $3150 (IQR $2352-$4201) for hospitalized infants treated for a SBI, and $3763 (IQR $2146-$5180) for infants discharged from the ED ultimately requiring hospitalization with a missed SBI. For a cohort of 1168 infants, cost-per-infant using PECARN risk-stratification was $1332 (IQR $1062-$1739), compared to $1515 (IQR $1198-$1992) using Rochester. PECARN criteria would be expected to produce an overall savings of 12.1% for the modeled cohort ($1,556,432 vs $1,769,339). Under pessimistic and optimistic model assumptions, total savings were 4.9% and 18.3%, respectively. Costs borne by families were not considered, nor were the indirect benefits of reduced unnecessary invasive testing, hospitalizations and broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Conclusion Risk-stratification of febrile infants using PECARN prediction rules would produce important cost-savings due to superior test characteristics offsetting upfront PCT-associated costs. Such a strategy would also likely result in unmodeled non-monetary family-centered and healthcare system benefits. Real-world cost-effectiveness studies are needed.