Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in females worldwide. Studies based on gene expression profiles have identified different breast cancer molecular subtypes, such as luminal A and B cells, cancer cells that are estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-enriched cells, cancer cells that exhibit an overexpression of the oncogene HER2, and triple-negative cells, cancer cells that are negative for ER, PR and HER2 expression. Immunohistochemistry is the most common type of method used for the identification of these molecular subtypes, through the identification of specific cell receptors. The present study aimed to evaluate the ER, PR and HER2 receptor expression in human breast cancer cell lines, and to classify the corresponding molecular subtype comparing two alternative methods. In the present study, a panel of human mammary carcinoma cell lines: BT-20; Hs578T; MCF-7; MCF-7/AZ; MDA-MB-231; MDA-MB-468; SKBR3; and T47D were used. Immunohistochemical and immunocytochemistry assays were used to characterize the breast cancer subtypes of these cell lines according to the expression of ER, PR and HER2 receptors. The results revealed the molecular characterization of this panel of breast cancer cell lines, using the differential expression of classical and clinically used markers in concordance with previous studies. In addition, these data are important for additional in vitro studies of these specific receptors.

Our results confirm the action of melatonin on the miR-152-3p regulation known to be involved in the progression of breast cancer.

The present review has for objective to stand out some aspects little argued of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), taking in consideration physiology, physiopathology and some new technologies of perfusion. Thus, some points, sometimes philosophical, had motivated the elaboration of this revision: a) To preserve and to bring up to date the surgeon CPB knowledge, for the simple fact to even keep its pedagogical leadership on its team; b) To question if patient aged and/or diabetic, for its individual characteristics, deserved more appropriate protocols as well as adopted for children; c) One third aspect would be the questioning of the systemic inflammatory reaction caused by the exposition of the blood to CPB non-endothelized circuit surface ahead of the increasing importance of the wound surgical contact of the blood; d) In relation to the treatment of the vasoplegic syndrome, methylene blue continues being the best therapeutical option, even so, many times are not efficient because of a highly probable existence of a "therapeutical window" based in the guanylate cyclase dynamics of action (saturation and synthesis "de novo") and; finally, e) The reason of the choice of the heading standing out that, in its current patterns, the CPB would be consequence of empirism, art, or science. The final message comes with the certainty of that as much the empirism, art and science are very strong concerning CPB.Descriptors: Extracorporeal circulation. Cardiopulmonary bypass. Cardiac surgical procedures. 79MOTA, AL ET AL -Adult cardiopulmonary bypass in the twentyfirst century. Science, art or empiricism? Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2008; 23(1): 78-92

At present, four main types of serotonin (5-HT) receptors have been identified in the brain (5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT3, and 5-HT4). In addition, the 5-HT1 have been further subclassified. We have taken advantage of a new selective 5-HT1D receptor agonist 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-N-methyl-1H-indole-5-methanesulfonamide succinate, Sumatriptan, to evaluate the role of 5-HT1D receptors on GH secretion. To this end, several tests with or without sumatriptan were undertaken in normal prepubertal children. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of Sumatriptan on basal GH secretion and the GH response to GHRH in obese children. In normal children, Sumatriptan administration (3 mg, sc) resulted in an increase in basal GH levels at 30 min (7.7 +/- 1.5 micrograms/L; P < 0.05) and increased GH responses to GHRH (47.3 +/- 6.4 vs. 29.6 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L; P < 0.05). The Sumatriptan-induced increase in GH responses to GHRH was dependent on the stimulus tested. Pretreatment with Sumatriptan did not modify the GH response to clonidine or pyridostigmine, as assessed by the peak GH response and the area under the curve. In contrast, it increased the GH response to arginine. In the obese subjects, the GH response to GHRH was reduced (7.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 29.6 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L at 30 min) compared to that in control children (P < 0.05). Sumatriptan administration did not alter the basal GH value (peak GH, 1.7 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L at 30 min). However, Sumatriptan administration clearly increased the effect of GHRH, resulting in a GH peak of 14.6 +/- 3.1 micrograms/L at 30 min (P < 0.01). To assess the specificity of Sumatriptan on anterior pituitary hormone secretion, we studied its effect on TSH and PRL responses to TRH as well as LH-releasing hormone-induced LH and FSH secretion. Administration of Sumatriptan did not alter the response of any of these hormones. Our results indicate that 5-HT1D receptors have a stimulatory effect on GH secretion, possibly by inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release.