BackgroundSpiders are predaceous arthropods that are capable of subduing and consuming relatively large prey items compared to their own body size. For this purpose, spiders have evolved potent venoms to immobilise prey and digestive fluids that break down nutrients inside the prey’s body by means of extra-oral digestion (EOD). Both secretions contain an array of active proteins, and an overlap of some components has been anecdotally reported, but not quantified. We systematically investigated the extent of such protein overlap. As venom injection and EOD succeed each other, we further infer functional explanations, and, by comparing two spider species belonging to different clades, assess its adaptive significance for spider EOD in general.ResultsWe describe the protein composition of the digestive fluids of the mygalomorph Acanthoscurria geniculata and the araneomorph Stegodyphus mimosarum, in comparison with previously published data on a third spider species. We found a number of similar hydrolases being highly abundant in all three species. Among them, members of the family of astacin-like metalloproteases were particularly abundant. While the importance of these proteases in spider venom and digestive fluid was previously noted, we now highlight their widespread use across different spider taxa. Finally, we found species specific differences in the protein overlap between venom and digestive fluid, with the difference being significantly greater in S. mimosarum compared to A. geniculata.ConclusionsThe injection of venom precedes the injection with digestive fluid, and the overlap of proteins between venom and digestive fluid suggests an early involvement in EOD. Species specific differences in the overlap may reflect differences in ecology between our two study species. The protein composition of the digestive fluid of all the three species we compared is highly similar, suggesting that the cocktail of enzymes is highly conserved and adapted to spider EOD.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3987-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contemporary animal signals may derive from an elaboration of existing forms or novel non-signalling traits. Unravelling the evolution of the latter is challenging because experiments investigating the maintenance of the signal may provide little insight into its early evolution. The web decorations, or stabilimenta of some orb web spiders represent an intriguing model system to investigate novel animal signals. For over 100 years, biologists have struggled to explain why spiders decorate their webs with additional threads of silk, producing a conspicuous signal on a construction whose function is to entangle unsuspecting prey. The numerous explanations for the maintenance of this behaviour starkly contrast with the absence of a plausible explanation for its evolutionary origin. Our review highlights the difficulties in resolving both the evolution and maintenance of animal signalling, and inferring the causative arrow-even from experimental studies. Drawing on recent research that focuses on physiological processes, we provide a model of the evolutionary progression of web-decorating behaviour.

No abstract

No abstract

Water is essential for all living organisms because it acts as a major solvent and reaction medium. Terrestrial animals may lose water through evaporation and excretion and consequently have evolved strategies to balance their water budget by either minimising losses or by gaining water. The major pathway to gain water is via food intake, although many animals additionally drink free water. Spiders acquire substantial amounts of water by ingesting enzymatically liquefied prey. However, this may not account for the water needs of some species. We tested whether drinking is essential for orb web spiders of the genus Argiope by experimentally manipulating the diet (flies or crickets) and water supply (no water or a daily shower) to females and then measuring their subsequent drinking behaviour. Individuals of Argiope trifasciata, which are typically found in dry habitats, increased their body mass when fed crickets but not when fed flies. However, spiders deprived of water subsequently ingested significantly more water than spiders that received water every day, regardless of their feeding regime. This pattern was replicated in Argiope aetherea, which is found in the tropics and perhaps less likely to be water deprived in natural populations. Our results reveal that drinking allows these spiders to realise their water balance independent from the nutritional status. We suggest that the spiders may need to drink fresh water to process ingested nutrients.