Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was performed in 19 patients with brain metastases from non-central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms and one patient with a primary CNS lymphoma. Various histopathologic types were represented by the primary neoplasms in the patients with metastases. Only 21 of the 31 lesions (68%) were detected with FDG PET as discrete, metabolically active foci (relative to surrounding structures). Six of the nondetected lesions may have been nondiscernible owing to their small size and/or isointensity relative to closely apposed normal gray matter. However, four lesions of at least 1.2 cm in diameter showed frankly decreased FDG accumulation relative to normal brain. These findings suggest that studies of FDG accumulation by a variety of non-CNS neoplasms and their CNS metastases are in order and that extrapolation of the successes of FDG PET in imaging of primary glial tumors to imaging of brain metastases should proceed with caution.

FDG PET can aid in differentiating benign from malignant strictly intraosseous lesions.

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) was performed in 19 patients referred for clinical evaluation of soft-tissue masses. These patients had 20 different lesions and had been evaluated previously with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The diagnoses were subsequently confirmed with open biopsy or excision (19 lesions) or by clinical and radiographic follow-up (one lesion). Semiquantitative assessment of FDG accumulation (differential uptake ratio) within the suspected tumor helped correctly separate the 10 malignant tumors from the 10 benign lesions. In contrast, a simple ratio of FDG uptake within the suspected tumor to that within comparable normal soft tissue was less successful in helping make this distinction, with overlap in 12 of the 20 cases. Careful comparison with findings from other available imaging studies is essential for accurate interpretation of PET studies of soft-tissue masses, but in many cases, PET may be a useful adjunct in the preoperative evaluation of suspected soft-tissue tumors, yielding valuable information that is not provided with CT or MR imaging.

No abstract