Sediment deposition is an issue affecting many rivers. To oppose it, sediment withdrawals are often used. However, this practice can trigger further problems in river and coastal sections but, on the other hand, periodic removal of deposited sediments can reduce flooding risk. Also, these sediments can be used for beach nourishment. Therefore, before carrying out a sediment withdrawal, it is necessary to analyze the whole basin to evaluate the consequences for the sediment balance. This paper describes a methodology to evaluate the effects of river sediment withdrawals through a case study on the Amendolea River, a torrential river in southern Italy. In particular, the methodology is divided into three main phases. The first phase was developed with GIS software in order to perimeter and to morphometrically characterize the river basin and its hydraulically and sedimentologically homogeneous sub-basins. The second phase was developed using the HEC-HMS software in order to evaluate the hydrological balance of the basin and its sub-basins. The last phase was developed using the HEC-RAS software (through the SIAM model) in order to identify the areas in erosion, in deposition and in equilibrium. Moreover, through this model is possible to identify the sections where sediments can be withdrawn, and to estimate the possible morphological river changes due to withdrawals. In this case study, the sediments will be taken from the sections where the bottom has elevations near or above those of adjacent lands, such as to increase the flooding risk. Sediment withdrawals will be taken without eroding the bottom and at a distance from the river banks that does not unstabilize them. Finally, the methodology described in this paper is based on the joint use of various open source software and can be used in any other river with hydrological regime similar to the Amendolea River.

In this chapter San Pietro di Deca represented an opportunity for scientific knowledge process experimentation applied to a small building with a great past, an unknown monument standing in north west of Sicily that recently has been studied by a team of Austrian archeologists. The first scientific survey carried out by the authors by means of the latest technology as well as all the stages of the research are presented: the historical research, the laser scanner survey, the critical analysis leading to the interpretation of the architecture's masonry structures, and an accurate analytical representation of the transformation processes experienced by the structure from its origin until today. The evaluation of the survey and its comparison with similar Byzantine Sicilian buildings were major steps confirming the hypotheses inferred on the morphological evolution of the structure.

In this chapter San Pietro di Deca represented an opportunity for scientific knowledge process experimentation applied to a small building with a great past, an unknown monument standing in north west of Sicily that recently has been studied by a team of Austrian archeologists. The first scientific survey carried out by the authors by means of the latest technology as well as all the stages of the research are presented: the historical research, the laser scanner survey, the critical analysis leading to the interpretation of the architecture's masonry structures, and an accurate analytical representation of the transformation processes experienced by the structure from its origin until today. The evaluation of the survey and its comparison with similar Byzantine Sicilian buildings were major steps confirming the hypotheses inferred on the morphological evolution of the structure.

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.