Background: There is a need for new small molecule pre-mRNA splicing inhibitors as biotools.Results: High throughput screening resulted in the identification of small molecule splicing inhibitors that are active in vitro and in cells.Conclusion: New small molecules for studying pre-mRNA splicing in vitro and in cells are identified.Significance: Small drug-like molecules are identified that modulate splicing in vitro and in cells.

We have identified the plant biflavonoid hinokiflavone as an inhibitor of splicing in vitro and modulator of alternative splicing in cells. Chemical synthesis confirms hinokiflavone is the active molecule. Hinokiflavone inhibits splicing in vitro by blocking spliceosome assembly, preventing formation of the B complex. Cells treated with hinokiflavone show altered subnuclear organization specifically of splicing factors required for A complex formation, which relocalize together with SUMO1 and SUMO2 into enlarged nuclear speckles containing polyadenylated RNA. Hinokiflavone increases protein SUMOylation levels, both in in vitro splicing reactions and in cells. Hinokiflavone also inhibited a purified, E. coli expressed SUMO protease, SENP1, in vitro, indicating the increase in SUMOylated proteins results primarily from inhibition of de-SUMOylation. Using a quantitative proteomics assay we identified many SUMO2 sites whose levels increased in cells following hinokiflavone treatment, with the major targets including six proteins that are components of the U2 snRNP and required for A complex formation.

Chromatin structure is an important factor in the functional coupling between transcription and mRNA processing, not only by regulating alternative splicing events, but also by contributing to exon recognition during constitutive splicing. We observed that depolarization of neuroblastoma cell membrane potential, which triggers general histone acetylation and regulates alternative splicing, causes a concentration of SR proteins in nuclear speckles. This prompted us to analyze the effect of chromatin structure on splicing factor distribution and dynamics. Here, we show that induction of histone hyper-acetylation results in the accumulation in speckles of multiple splicing factors in different cell types. In addition, a similar effect is observed after depletion of the heterochromatic protein HP1α, associated with repressive chromatin. We used advanced imaging approaches to analyze in detail both the structural organization of the speckle compartment and nuclear distribution of splicing factors, as well as studying direct interactions between splicing factors and their association with chromatin in vivo. The results support a model where perturbation of normal chromatin structure decreases the recruitment efficiency of splicing factors to nascent RNAs, thus causing their accumulation in speckles, which buffer the amount of free molecules in the nucleoplasm. To test this, we analyzed the recruitment of the general splicing factor U2AF65 to nascent RNAs by iCLIP technique, as a way to monitor early spliceosome assembly. We demonstrate that indeed histone hyper-acetylation decreases recruitment of U2AF65 to bulk 3′ splice sites, coincident with the change in its localization. In addition, prior to the maximum accumulation in speckles, ∼20% of genes already show a tendency to decreased binding, while U2AF65 seems to increase its binding to the speckle-located ncRNA MALAT1. All together, the combined imaging and biochemical approaches support a model where chromatin structure is essential for efficient co-transcriptional recruitment of general and regulatory splicing factors to pre-mRNA.

Gene expression of human papillomaviruses (HPV) is tightly controlled by cellular factors and by the virally encoded E2 protein through binding to distinct sites within the regulatory noncoding region. While for the high-risk genital papillomaviruses a single promoter drives the expression of all early genes, a second promoter present in the E6 open reading frame of the low-risk HPV type 6 (HPV6) would allow an independent regulation of E6 and E7 oncogene expression. In this report, we provide the first evidence that E2 regulates both early promoters of HPV6 separately and we show that promoter usage as well as E2 regulation is cell type dependent. Among the different epithelial cell lines tested, only RTS3b cells allowed an expression pattern similar to that observed in naturally infected benign condylomas. While the E6 promoter was repressed by E2 to 50% of its basal activity, the E7 promoter was simultaneously stimulated up to fivefold. Activation of the E7 promoter was mediated predominantly by the binding of E2 to the most promoter-distal E2 binding site. Repression of the E6 promoter depended on the presence of two intact promoter-proximal binding sites. Mutation of both of these repressor binding sites reversed the effect of E2 on the E6 promoter from repression to activation. In contrast, in HT3 cells we observed an E2-mediated activation of the E6 promoter in the context of the wild-type noncoding region. This indicated that repression of the E6 promoter by binding of E2 to both promoterproximal binding sites did not function in the cellular environment provided by HT3 cells. These data suggest that the separate regulation of the E6 and E7 promoters of HPV6 is mediated through successive occupation of binding sites with different affinities for E2 depending on the intracellular concentration of E2 and on the cellular environment provided by the infected cell.

Pre-mRNA splicing is a fundamental process in mammalian gene expression and alternative splicing plays an extensive role in generating protein diversity. Since the majority of genes undergo pre-mRNA splicing, most cellular processes depend on proper spliceosome function.Here we focus on the cell cycle and describe its dependence on pre-mRNA splicing and accurate alternative splicing. We outline the key cell cycle factors and their known alternative splicing isoforms. We discuss different levels of pre-mRNA splicing regulation such as posttranslational modifications and changes in expression of splicing factors. We describe the effect of chromatin dynamics on pre-mRNA splicing during the cell cycle. In addition, we focus on the spliceosome component SF3B1, which is mutated in many types of cancer, and describe the link of SF3B1 and its inhibitors to cell cycle.