Human dentin is not only a composite material of a collagenous matrix and mineral to provide strength and elasticity to teeth, but also a precious reservoir full of bioactive proteins. They are released after demineralization caused by bacterial acids in carious lesions, by decalcifying irrigants or dental materials and they modulate tissue responses in the underlying dental pulp. This work describes a first-time analysis of the proteome of human dentin using a shotgun proteomic approach that combines three different protein fractionation methods. Dentin matrix proteins were extracted by EDTA and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), OFFGEL isoelectric focusing (IEF) or strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified 813 human proteins with high confidence, however, isoelectric focusing turned out to be the most beneficial prefractionation method. All Proteins were categorized based on the PANTHER system and representation analysis revealed 31 classes and subclasses to be overrepresented. The acquired knowledge provides a comprehensive insight into the number of proteins in human dentin as well as their physiological and pathological functions. Thus, the data presented paves the way to the analysis of specific functions of dentin matrix proteins in vivo and their potential in tissue engineering approaches to regenerate dental pulp.
Both the dental pulp and the apical papilla represent a promising source of mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative endodontic protocols. The aim of this study was to outline molecular biological conformities and differences between dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) and stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP). Thus, cells were isolated from the pulp and the apical papilla of an extracted molar and analyzed for mesenchymal stem cell markers as well as multi-lineage differentiation. During induced osteogenic differentiation, viability, proliferation, and wound healing assays were performed, and secreted signaling molecules were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Transcriptome-wide gene expression was profiled by microarrays and validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene regulation was evaluated in the context of culture parameters and functionality. Both cell types expressed mesenchymal stem cell markers and were able to enter various lineages. DPSC and SCAP showed no significant differences in cell viability, proliferation, or migration; however, variations were observed in the profile of secreted molecules. Transcriptome analysis revealed the most significant gene regulation during the differentiation period, and 13 biomarkers were identified whose regulation was essential for both cell types. DPSC and SCAP share many features and their differentiation follows similar patterns. From a molecular biological perspective, both seem to be equally suitable for dental pulp tissue engineering.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate different protocols of enzymatic treatment (collagenase with either protease, trypsin or hyaluronidase) to isolate mature odontoblasts. Primary odontoblasts were obtained from human molars, which was confirmed by histology and scanning electron microscopy. The combination of collagenase with protease appeared most suitable and resulted in higher cell numbers and better integrity of the odontoblast processes, whereas combination with hyaluronidase or trypsin led to truncated processes and detachment of cell patches instead of single cells. However, trypan blue staining after 24 h showed that odontoblasts in culture did not remain viable. Gene expression analysis was possible after mRNA extraction from tissues ex vivo and real-time semi-quantitative PCR revealed increased expression of collagen, nestin, bone sialoprotein and dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1 in the odontoblast layer. Though primary odontoblasts could not be cultivated after isolation, characteristic genes were identified to differentiate odontoblasts from pulp fibroblasts.
The objective of this study was to compare the ability of different endodontic irrigation activation methods to enable irrigant penetration, remove the smear layer from root canal walls after preparation, and investigate surface effects on dentine. Root canals of 90 single-rooted teeth were prepared and irrigated with EDTA (17%) and sodium hypochlorite (5%), where both irrigants or sodium hypochlorite only were activated as follows: conventional needle irrigation, ultrasonic activation, sonic activation (EDDY), or laser-based activation (photon-induced photoacoustic streaming/PIPS). For the evaluation of irrigant penetration into dentinal tubules, methylene blue was injected and activated as well. Subsequently, teeth were sectioned horizontally, and dye penetration depths were measured. Alternating sections were split in halves and randomly selected for scanning electron microscopic analysis. Root canal dentine was assessed for smear layer removal and surface disintegration according to a defined scoring system. The data were analyzed statistically with nonparametric and chi-squared tests for whole teeth and separately for coronal, middle, and apical thirds. All the tested activation methods removed a thicker smear layer than needle irrigation only. Additional activation of EDTA improved penetration depths of the irrigants, but not the smear layer removal. Surface disintegration of root canal dentine was observed with the additional activation of EDTA and particularly after laser-based techniques. Additional activation of EDTA does not seem to offer any convincing advantages in terms of irrigant penetration or smear layer removal but disrupts the dentine surface. Especially laser-based activation resulted in undesirable destruction of root canal wall dentine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.