(universities, research organizations, companies, associations, etc.) (conferences, symposia, and meetings). KEy WoRDSEye tracking, face recognition, fixation duration, face elements, area of interest, heat maps eye-tracking analysis of face observing and face recognition
Facial images are an important element of nonverbal communication. Eye-tracking systems enable us to objectively measure and analyse the way we look at facial images and thus to study the behaviour of observers. Different ways of looking at facial images influence the process of remembering faces and recognition performance. In the real world we are dealing with different representations of faces, especially when we look at them from different angles. Memory and recognition performance are different when test subjects look at the face from the frontal or from a profile view. We studied crossobservation and recognition, so we performed two tests. In the first test, subjects observed facial images shown in the frontal view and recognized them in the profile view. In the second test, the faces were observed from the profile and recognized in the frontal view. The presentation time in the observation test was four seconds, which was found to be an adequate time for sufficient recognition in some previous tests. The results were analysed with the well-known time and spatial method based on fixations and saccades and with the new area method using heatmaps of the eye tracking results. We found that the recognition success (correct and incorrect recognition) was better when the combination of frontal view and profile recognition was used. The results were then confirmed by measuring the fixation duration and saccade length. More visible facial features resulted in a shorter fixation duration and shorter saccade length, which led to a better memory. We also confirmed the results of observation and recognition by area analysis, where we measured the area, perimeter and circularity of heatmaps. Here we found that larger areas and perimeter and smaller circularity of heatmaps resulted in better memory of facial images and therefore better recognition.
Facial images have been the subject of research for many years, using the eye-tracking system. However, most researchers concentrate on the frontal view of facial images. Much less research has been done on faces shown at different angles or profile views of faces in facial images. However, as we know, in reality we often view faces from different angles and not just from a frontal view. In our research we used a profile presentation of facial images and analyzed memory and recognition depending on the display time and dimensions of the facial images. Two tests were performed, i.e. the observation and the recognition test, and we used the well-known yes/no detection theory. We used four different display times in the observation test (1, 2, 4 and 8 seconds) and two different dimensions of facial images 640 × 480 and 1280 × 960). All facial images were taken from the standardized face database Minear&Park. We measured the recognition success which is mostly presented as a discrimination index A’, incorrect recognition (FA – false alarm) and time-spatial method based on fixation duration and saccade length. In this case, eye tracking provides us with objective results when viewing facial images. In the results it was found that extending the display time of facial images improves recognition performance and that the dependence is logarithmic. At the same time, wrong recognition decreased. Both parameters are independent of the dimensions of the facial images. This fact has been proven by some other researchers also for frontal facial images. It was also discovered that with an increase of the display time of facial images an increase of the fixation duration and saccade lengths occurred. In all results we detected major changes at the display time of four seconds, which we consider as a time, where the subjects looked at the whole face and their gaze returned to the center of the face (in our case eye and mouth).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.