BackgroundTo analyze the results of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT).MethodsInclusion criteria: participants with primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma (excluding uveitic) who had undergone SLT 360° (SLT 1) with diminution of response over time followed by repeat SLT 360° (SLT 2). Six months of follow-up were required and at least 6 months in between SLT 1 and 2. The main outcome measures were IOP reduction at 6 and 12 months and a comparison of the response between SLT 1 and 2.ResultsOne hundred thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. If only one eye had repeat treatment, that eye was chosen; if both eyes qualified, one was chosen at random. The baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) for SLT 1 = 20.3+/− 5.2 mmHg and SLT 2 = 19.4 +/− 5.0 was reduced to 16.4 +/− 3.9 and 16.7 +/− 4.7 at 1 year, respectively (p < .001). Medication use was not significantly changed, and was 2.2 +/− 1.2 at baseline for SLT 1 and 2.1 +/− 1.3 for SLT 2, and at 1 year was 1.9 +/− 1.3 and 2.2 +/− 1.2, respectively. A subanalysis of 62 patients matched for equivalent baselines showed a baseline IOP = 18.7 +/− 3.8 for SLT 1 and 18.7 +/− 3.5 for SLT 2, reduced to 16.0 +/− 4.3 and 15.3 +/− 3.8 at 1 year (p < .001).ConclusionRepeat SLT laser (360-degree treatment, followed by a loss of effect over time, then a second 360-degree treatment) in this population resulted in IOP lowering similar to that of the initial treatment.
Précis:
Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MPCP) lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) in the short-term but nearly half required additional intervention. Mydriasis was the most common complication (11%); 15% lost ≥3 Snellen lines of acuity; 11% had persistent complications at last follow-up.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of MPCP in a large series of patients with all stages of glaucoma.
Design:
Multicenter, retrospective chart review of patients from 3 clinical sites.
Participants:
One hundred sixty-seven eyes of 143 patients.
Methods:
MPCP was performed with 2000 mW energy, 31.3% duty cycle and 2 to 4 180-degree applications of 80 seconds duration each per treatment. The procedure was considered a failure if any of the following occurred: additional IOP lowering intervention, <20% IOP reduction from baseline at the last follow-up (with or without medication), or severe complications.
Results:
Mean age was 71 years, 53% were female, and 53% were Asian. 60% of eyes had POAG, 63% were pseudophakic, 38% had prior glaucoma surgery, and 51% had Snellen visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better. Mean follow-up time was 11.9±7.8 months. Mean IOP was 21.9±8.4 mm Hg before intervention, and 17.4±7.2 mm Hg at last follow-up (P<0.0001). There was no change in mean logMAR VA (P=0.0565) but 15% lost ≥3 Snellen lines of VA. The success rate was 36.5% (61/167 eyes) at last follow-up. The probability of survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 82%, 71%, and 57% at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure, respectively. The reasons for failure were additional intervention in 47%, inadequate IOP reduction in 14%, and severe complication in 1.8%. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, female sex was associated with a 56% decrease in failure rate compared with males (P<0.0001), while a unit increase in baseline IOP corresponded with a 5.7% increase in failure rate (P<0.0001). If repeat MPCP was allowed then success rate increased to 58%. There were no complications in 73% (122/167) but 11% (18/167) had persistent complications at the last follow-up and half of these 18 eyes had decrease in VA of 1 to 6 Snellen lines. Asian race (odds ratio 13.5, P=0.0131) and phakic status (odds ratio 3.1, P=0.0386) were associated with higher odds of developing mydriasis, which was the most common complication.
Conclusions:
MPCP lowered IOP in the short-term but nearly half required additional IOP lowering intervention. Potential complications should be discussed in detail especially when the procedure is being considered for those with good VA and early stage disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.