Predicting a person's gender based on the iris texture has been explored by several researchers. This paper considers several dimensions of experimental work on this problem, including person-disjoint train and test, and the effect of cosmetics on eyelash occlusion and imperfect segmentation. We also consider the use of multi-layer perceptron and convolutional neural networks as classifiers, comparing the use of data-driven and hand-crafted features. Our results suggest that the gender-from-iris problem is more difficult than has so far been appreciated. Estimating accuracy using a mean of N person-disjoint train and test partitions, and considering the effect of makeup -a combination of experimental conditions not present in any previous work -we find a much weaker ability to predict genderfrom-iris texture than has been suggested in previous work.
The adoption of large-scale iris recognition systems around the world has brought to light the importance of detecting presentation attack images (textured contact lenses and printouts). This work presents a new approach in iris Presentation Attack Detection (PAD), by exploring combinations of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformed input spaces through binarized statistical image features (BSIF). Our method combines lightweight CNNs to classify multiple BSIF views of the input image. Following explorations on complementary input spaces leading to more discriminative features to detect presentation attacks, we also propose an algorithm to select the best (and most discriminative) predictors for the task at hand. An ensemble of predictors makes use of their expected individual performances to aggregate their results into a final prediction. Results show that this technique improves on the current state of the art in iris PAD, outperforming the winner of LivDet-Iris 2017 competition both for intra-and cross-dataset scenarios, and illustrating the very difficult nature of the cross-dataset scenario.
Post-mortem biometrics entails utilizing the biometric data of a deceased individual for determining or verifying human identity. Due to fundamental biological changes that occur in a person's biometric traits after death, post-mortem data can be significantly different from ante-mortem data, introducing new challenges for biometric sensors, feature extractors and matchers. This paper surveys research to date on the problem of using iris images acquired after death for automated human recognition. A comprehensive review of existing literature is complemented by a summary of the most recent results and observations offered in these publications. This survey is unique in several elements. Firstly, it is the first publication to consider iris recognition where gallery images are acquired before death (perimortem images) and the probe images are acquired after death from the same subjects. Secondly, results are presented from the largest database of peri-mortem and post-mortem iris images, collected from 213 subjects by two independent institutions located in the U.S. and Poland. Thirdly, post-mortem recognition viability is assessed using more than 20 iris recognition algorithms, ranging from the classic (e.g., Gabor filteringbased) to the modern (e.g., deep learning-based). Finally, we provide a medically informed commentary on post-mortem iris, analyze the reasons for recognition failures, and identify key directions for future research.
Iris recognition systems are a mature technology that is widely used throughout the world. In identification (as opposed to verification) mode, an iris to be recognized is typically matched against all N enrolled irises. This is the classic "1-to-N search". In order to improve the speed of large-scale identification, a modified "1-to-First" search has been used in some operational systems. A 1-to-First search terminates with the first below-threshold match that is found, whereas a 1-to-N search always finds the best match across all enrollments. We know of no previous studies that evaluate how the accuracy of 1-to-First search differs from that of 1-to-N search. Using a dataset of over 50,000 iris images from 2,800 different irises, we perform experiments to evaluate the relative accuracy of 1-to-First and 1-to-N search. We evaluate how the accuracy difference changes with larger numbers of enrolled irises, and with larger ranges of rotational difference allowed between iris images. We find that False Match error rate for 1-toFirst is higher than for 1-to-N, and the the difference grows with larger number of enrolled irises and with larger range of rotation.
As the public Ethereum network surpasses half a billion transactions and enterprise Blockchain systems becoming highly capable of meeting the demands of global deployments, production Blockchain applications are fast becoming commonplace across a diverse range of business and scientific verticals. In this paper, we reflect on work we have been conducting recently surrounding the ingestion, retrieval and analysis of Blockchain data. We describe the scaling and semantic challenges when extracting Blockchain data in a way that preserves the original metadata of each transaction by cross referencing the Smart Contract interface with the on-chain data. We then discuss a scientific use case in the area of Scientific workflows by describing how we can harvest data from tasks and dependencies in a generic way. We then discuss how crawled public blockchain data can be analyzed using two unsupervised machine learning algorithms, which are designed to identify outlier accounts or smart contracts in the system. We compare and contrast the two machine learning methods and cross correlate with public Websites to illustrate the effectiveness such approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.