The main purpose of the study was to compare topoisomerase 2α (TOP2A) status in invasive breast carcinomas to the outcome of a therapy containing neoadjuvant treatment with anthracyclines (a combination chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer, namely AC [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin]). To achieve these goals we created a method of evaluation with criteria based on two methods used in the present study (immunohistochemical [IHC] and fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]). The threshold for positive immunohistochemically evaluated status was set for all cases with: nuclear stain intensity score 3+ in 10% or more nuclei and nuclear stain intensity score 2+ in 50% or more nuclei. Our results suggest that TOP2A status may be used as a predictive factor for patient selection for protocols which include anthracyclines as one of the chemotherapeutics. Both methods, IHC and FISH, are suitable for implementation for diagnostic purposes, but IHC positive status measured according to the criteria presented above is the best predictor of longer disease-free survival (DFS) according to our study. Immunohistochemical also gave satisfactory results in all analyzed cases in comparison to only 60% of cases analyzed by FISH.

To validate the reliability and implementation of an objective diagnostic method for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). H3-3A gene mutation testing was performed using two different methods, Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. A total of 214 patients, including 120 with GCTB and 94 with other giant cell-rich bone lesions, participated in the study. Sanger sequencing and IHC with anti-histone H3.3 G34W and G34V antibodies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, which were previously decalcified in EDTA if needed. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular method was 100% (95% CI: 96.97–100%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.15–100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC was 94.32% (95% CI: 87.24–98.13%) and 100% (95% CI: 93.94–100.0%), respectively. P.G35 mutations were discovered in 2/9 (22.2%) secondary malignant GCTBs and 9/13 (69.2%) GCTB after denosumab treatment. We confirmed in a large series of patients that evaluation of H3-3A mutational status using direct sequencing is a reliable tool for diagnosing GCTB, and it should be incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm. Additionally, we discovered IHC can be used as a screening tool. Proper tissue processing and decalcification are necessary. The presence of the H3-3A mutation did not exclude malignant GCTB. Denosumab did not eradicate the neoplastic cell population of GCTB.

(1) Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a rare low-grade neoplasm of the sinonasal tract. It is characterized by specific PAX3 gene rearrangements and both myogenic and neural differentiation. The purpose of the study was to describe the histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features of BSNS and indicate important clues for small incisional biopsy diagnostics. (2) Methods: Archival samples from patients with nasal cavities or ethmoid sinuses tumors were searched for BSNS cases. Inclusion criteria were the presence of spindle cell morphology and low-grade appearance. Both biopsy and resection specimens were stained for identical IHC panels including, i.a., S100, SMA, SOX10 and PAX3. FISH for PAX3 and SS18 was performed on biopsy specimens. (3) Results: BSNS diagnosis was made in 6 cases included in the study and confirmed by PAX3 rearrangement by FISH in 5 specimens. The pattern of IHC expression was identical for paired biopsy and resection samples apart from one BSNS case. (4) Conclusions: Incisional biopsy seems to be a sufficient method to establish BSNS diagnosis in most cases. Characteristic morphological features together with S100, SOX10 and SMA as the screening markers are useful for confirming the diagnosis. In cases of divergent morphology and immunoprofile evaluation of PAX3 rearrangement is vital.

Wstęp. Rak piersi jest najczęstszym nowotworem u kobiet w Polsce. Nadmierna ekspresja białka HER2 lub amplifikacja genu HER2 jest związana ze złym rokowaniem i stanowi wskazanie do zastosowania terapii anty-HER2. W przypadkach wątpliwych rozstrzygającym badaniem jest ocena FISH, wskazująca status amplifikacji genu HER2 według obowiązujących wytycznych ASCO-CAP, które w roku 2013 uległy zmianom. Celem pracy było sprawdzenie, czy i w jaki sposób zmiana zaleceń wpłynęła na rozkład wyników badań FISH w tej grupie pacjentów. Materiały i metody. Analizie porównawczej poddano wyniki rutynowej diagnostyki metodą FISH w dwóch niezależnych grupach pacjentów z zastosowaniem dwóch różnych kryteriów oceny (ASCO-CAP 2007 dla n = 680 i ASCO-CAP 2013 dla n = 851) oraz w grupie 763 pacjentów, gdzie zastosowano równolegle obydwa kryteria oceny. Wyniki. Porównanie wyników uzyskanych w dwóch niezależnych grupach wykazało brak istotnej zmiany odsetka wyników HER2-dodatnich (z amplifikacją) po zmianie kryteriów oceny. Istotne statystycznie okazało się zmniejszenie grupy wyników HER2-negatywnych (bez amplifikacji) z 76,2% na 61,8% przy rozszerzeniu grupy niejednoznacznej (o nieokreślonym statusie amplifikacji) z 0,4% do 13,6%. Grupa badana równolegle wg kryteriów 2007 i 2013 wykazała różnice istotne statystycznie. Zanotowano wzrost przypadków HER2-pozytywnych z 10,6% do 16,8%, znaczny wzrost wyników niejednoznacznych, z 4,2% na 15,6%, przy równoczesnym spadku wyników negatywnych z 85,2% na 67,6%. Wnioski. Zastosowanie nowych wytycznych ASCO-CAP 2013 w ocenie statusu genu HER2 wpływa na zawężenie grupy wyników negatywnych, natomiast rozszerza grupę wyników pozytywnych i niejednoznacznych. Wynik taki wskazuje na rozszerzenie dostępu do kwalifikacji w kierunku terapii anty-HER2. Natomiast istotny wzrost odsetka pacjentów z wynikiem o nieokreślonym statusie amplifikacji genu HER2 wskazuje na konieczność pogłębionej w tej grupie oceny FISH w celu uzyskania możliwości jednoznacznej stratyfikacji do grup ryzyka. The impact of changes in ASCO-CAP recommendations on the FISH-based assessment of the HER2 gene status in the qualification of breast cancer patients for HER2-targeted therapy Introduction. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Polish women. Overexpression of the HER2 protein or HER2 gene amplification is associated with a poor prognosis, simultaneously being an indication for the HER2-targeted therapy. In equivocal cases, the FISH assay is used for the final identification of the HER2 gene status. This evaluation should be performed according to the ASCO-CAP guidelines which have been changed in 2013. The aim of this study was to assess whether and how the changes of recommendations affected the distribution of the FISH results. Materials and methods. The results of routine diagnostic FISH analyses were compared for two independent groups of patients assessed with different evaluation criteria (ASCO-CAP 2007 for n = 680 and ASCO-CAP 2013 n = 851), and also in a group of 763 patients, where both criteria were used simultaneous...

No abstract