This paper seeks to analyze an endogenous development scheme implemented by farming families, involving innovations in the organic production of watermelons; this was a novel local initiative reflecting the creative drive of the farmers themselves, against a background marked by considerable political and institutional uncertainty. The scheme was evaluated in terms of a set of systemic properties measured by multidimensional indicators for farming systems. Data on the selected indicators were collected by field observations, monitoring of production units, and direct semi-structured interviews with farmers. In general terms, the innovations prompted improvements in the various components of extensive environmental and social sustainability, enabling a more sustainable land use through chemical, physical and biological improvements to the soil in the farming systems studied, ensuring increased incomes and the maintenance of family employment, strengthening the farmers' resources and improving their control over resources, and reducing the degree of dependency in relations between the farming unit and the broader context.
El objetivo de este artículo es comprender cómo la Economía Social y Solidaria (ESS) y la Agroecología pueden contribuir a la sostenibilidad económica, social, ecológica y política de la agricultura familiar en Brasil. Para ello, se expondrán sus dimensiones y las diferentes formas de obtener la viabilidad de determinadas explotaciones familiares. Como metodología de investigación se ha empleado el uso de indicadores de sostenibilidad creados por los autores para realizar los análisis de las experiencias de cooperativas de agricultores familiares en Brasil. Las cooperativas seleccionadas fueron las pertenecientes a la Asociación de Agricultores Ipê y Antonio Prado (AECIA) en la ciudad de Antonio Prado localizada en el estado de Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) y la Cooperativa IRITUIA en la ciudad de Irituia en el estado de Pará (Brasil) como locus de la investigación. Los resultados de la investigación apuntan a que existen diferencias entre las cooperativas estudiadas en cuanto a la viabilidad productiva, social, política y económica tanto desde la ESS como desde la Agroecología, de manera que AECIA ofrece mejores valores en todos los atributos estudiados frente a la Cooperativa de Irituia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.