we performed 504 outpatient LCs. We applied both exclusion and inclusion criteria, an anesthetic and surgical protocol, and discharge-specific criteria. Postoperative management in "fast track" regime. Postoperative period controlled by protocol, including phone calls after cholecystectomy.Results: the ambulatory percentage in the global series was 88.8%, and mean hospital stay was 6.1 hours. Fifty-one patients required overnight stays (10.1%), most of them for "social" causes. Five patients required admission (between 24 and 48 hours) for different causes (conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative neumothorax, and postoperative medical complications). Six patients (1.1%) were readmitted, and we observed 11.6% postoperative complications in the global series, with abdominal parietal pain being most frequent. Phone localization by 22.00 p.m. in the same day of surgery was 100% complete for outpatient cases. Postoperative surveillance within the first month after surgery was completed in 93.9%, and within th first year in 86.7% of patients.Conclusions: outpatient LC is safe and feasible, and probably represents a new "gold standard" in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis.

No abstract

Whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) should be performed as an outpatient procedure is still under discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of surgeon's experience in ambulatory management of LC. Three hundred eighty-one consecutive elective LCs were planned as outpatient procedures. An anesthetic protocol that includes free-opiates anesthesia, preemptive analgesia, and somatovisceral blockade was used. Percentages of ambulatory, overnight, and admitted patients were evaluated, and time series variation was also analyzed. Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting incidence, postoperative recovery, and complications were examined. Two hundred ninety-one patients were strictly ambulatory (76.3%), 71 (18.6%) required overnight admission, and 19 (4.9%) were admitted. Percentage of ambulatory LC increased from 22% to 90% in 4 years of experience. Readmission rate was 0.01%. Free-opiates anesthetic techniques, preemptive analgesia, and somatovisceral blockade allowed us to obtain over 90% of ambulatory LC. The learning curve related to postoperative evaluation is crucial in obtaining those results.

Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, clinical features and role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with chronic acalculous cholecystitis (CAC) in comparison with a control group of patients who underwent cholecystectomy for chronic calculous cholecystitis (CCC). Material and methods: prospective evaluation of 34 patients with CAC in contrast with 297 patients with CCC. Outcome measures: clinical presentation, quality of life using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), usefulness derived from the therapeutic procedure as measured in quality of life units by GIQLI, and clinical efficacy at one year of follow-up. Results: the incidence of complicated biliary disease was higher in CAC (27%), in comparison with CCC (13.8%). The histological study of the excised gallbladder revealed a higher incidence of cholesterolosis associated with chronic cholecystitis in the CAC group (64.9%). GIQLI showed significant differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements in both groups. The associated usefulness of LC was similar in both groups (73 versus 67.3 per cent), confirming an important increase in quality of life for both categories. Conclusions: the incidence of CAC is 11 per cent with a high association with cholesterolosis. Quality of life and LC usefulness are similar to those of patients with CCC. Due to the fact that cholecistogammagraphy is a technique not available in daily clinical practice, and that oral cholecystography and dynamic ultrasound are reliable when a positive result is obtained, extended clinical evaluation is still the most reliable indicator for cholecystectomy.

No abstract