This article presents the final reflections of the Investigative-Intervention Team in Socially-Critical Psychology after almost three years of participative investigation-intervention with governmental and non-governmental organizations, victims and their families, and other members of communities affected by Colombia’s internal armed conflict. The central aim was to value and construct on-going and future processes of accompaniment and reparations. Given the intervening nature of the process, we simultaneously designed and evaluated various ways of jointly defining, framing, and building conversational processes and strategies as well as the encounters between participants. The process was important for the psychosocial teams, whose presence in the country in terms of providing attention to victims is rather recent, as well as for victims and actors from the legal community, who found ways of collaboratively presenting, participating, and defining the available psychosocial-legal needs, opportunities, and resources in order to encourage the processes of accompaniment and reparation. This learning process was critical to the organization of a national meeting of governmental and non-governmental organizations, victims, and academics that widened perspectives on and enriched our understanding of the context in which victims are attended. The process generated a series of reflections that we gather in this article under the heading lineamentos (guidelines) and in which we privilege the experience and understanding developed by team itself.

cada región hay una completa homogeneidad: la edad, la etnia, los niveles educativos y, desde luego, la clase social, se convierten en tamices reguladores del cuerpo.

Versiones anteriores de este texto fueron presentadas como conferencia por invitación en el Congreso Internacional sobre 'Nuevos Paradigmas Transdisciplinarios en las Ciencias Humanas', organizado

Resumen: La investigación de la cual este texto hace parte sigue el camino abierto por Judith Butler (1987Butler ( , 1990ª, 1990b, en el sentido de someter las teorías del postestructuralismo a una reformulación específicamente feminista antes que su mera aplicación a los problemas del género. Tal empeño, sin embargo, se enmarca en la transformación que el formalismo postestructuralista ha experimentado al migrar hacia otros campos problemáticos, en los cuales "ha adquirido una vida nueva y transplantada en el terreno de la teoría cultural." (Butler, 1990a: 11).Palabras clave: sujeto, subjetividad, corporalidad, cultura, mujer, identidad, lo femenino, género, filosofía feminista. Abstract:The research of which this text makes part follows the road opened up by Judith Butler (1987Butler ( , 1990ª, 1990b, in the sense of subjecting the poststructuralist theories to a specifically feminist reformulation instead of merely applying them to gender problems. Such an endeavor, however, is framed in the transformation that poststructuralist formalism has experienced by turning into other problematic fields, in which it "has acquired a new life and has been transplanted into the grounds of cultural theory." (Butler, 1990a: 11).

No abstract