Summary
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) of the Central Nervous System (IFI‐CNS) and Paranasal Sinuses (IFI‐PS) are rare, life‐threatening infections in haematologic patients, and their management remains a challenge despite the availability of new diagnostic techniques and novel antifungal agents. In addition, analyses of large cohorts of patients focusing on these rare IFI are still lacking. Between January 2010 and December 2016, 89 consecutive cases of Proven (53) or Probable (36) IFI‐CNS (71/89) and IFI‐PS (18/89) were collected in 34 haematological centres. The median age was 40 years (range 5‐79); acute leukaemia was the most common underlying disease (69%) and 29% of cases received a previous allogeneic stem cell transplant. Aspergillus spp. were the most common pathogens (69%), followed by mucormycetes (22%), Cryptococcus spp. (4%) and Fusarium spp. (2%). The lung was the primary focus of fungal infection (48% of cases). The nervous system biopsy was performed in 10% of IFI‐CNS, and a sinus biopsy was performed in 56% of IFI‐PS (P = 0.03). The Galactomannan test on cerebrospinal fluid has been performed in 42% of IFI‐CNS (30/71), and it was positive in 67%. Eighty‐four pts received a first‐line antifungal therapy with Amphotericine B in 58% of cases, Voriconazole in 31% and both in 11%. Moreover, 58% of patients received 2 or more lines of therapy and 38% were treated with a combination of 2 or more antifungal drugs. The median duration of antifungal therapy was 60 days (range 5‐835). A surgical intervention was performed in 26% of cases but only 10% of IFI‐CNS underwent neurosurgical intervention. The overall response rate to antifungal therapy (complete or partial response) was 57%, and 1‐year overall survival was 32% without significant differences between IFI‐CNS and IFI‐PS. The overall mortality was 69% but the IFI attributable mortality was 33%. Mortality of IFI‐CNS/PS remains high but, compared to previous historical data, it seems to be reduced probably due to the availability of newer antifungal drugs. The results arising from this large contemporary cohort of cases may allow a more effective diagnostic and therapeutic management of these very rare IFI complications in haematologic patients.
The purpose of the present study is to estimate the current incidence of febrile events (FEs) and infectious episodes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and evaluate the outcome. We analyzed data on all FEs in a cohort of patients affected by ALL admitted to 20 Italian hematologic centers during 21 months of observation from April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013. Data about treatment phase, steroids, neutropenia, type and site of infection, and outcome of infection were collected. The population comprehended 271 ALL adult patients. Median age was 46 years old (range 19-75), M/F 1.1:1. We collected 179 FEs occurring during 395 different phases of treatment in 127 patients (45.3% incidence): remission induction treatment 53.1%, consolidation/maintenance 35.7%, treatment for a first or second relapse 44.3%, and refractory disease 85.7%. The incidence of FUO (fever of unknown origin) was 55/395 (13.9%). In the remaining cases, bacteria caused 92 FEs (23.2%), fungi 17 (4.3%), viruses 5 (1%). Mixed infections occurred in 10 cases mainly fungal+bacterial (9/10 cases). Neutropenia was mostly present at onset of FE (89.9% of FEs). Mortality rate was 11.7% (21/179) while 16 deaths occurred with evidence of infection (8.9%). Age > 60 years, neutropenia, poor performance status, steroids, refractory disease, and mixed infections significantly correlated with infection-related mortality. A statistically significant association with mortality was observed also for pulmonary localization and bacteremia. Our study describes the real-life epidemiological scenario of infections in ALL and identifies a subset of patients who are at higher risk for infection-related mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.